hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ben Wallace vs. Grant Hill: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Grant Hill ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#153Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#112Leads
+5.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.1Leads
+4.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0Leads
16.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.7Leads
+2,994 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,673 pts
0Top-10 impact seasons2Leads

Career Impact Rank places Grant Hill #112 and Ben Wallace #153. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Ben Wallace had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/ben-wallace/grant-hill/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBen Wallace19.947 · No. 153Grant Hill15.773 · No. 112

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Ben Wallace

19.947 composite · No. 153 all-time

Ben Wallace's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 112001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate16.33350%8.167
Best 5No. 112001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 282006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.60030%5.880
Best 10No. 112001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 282006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 392009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 412000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 421999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate29.50020%5.900

8.167 + 5.880 + 5.900= 19.947

Grant Hill

15.773 composite · No. 112 all-time

Grant Hill's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 31996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.66750%4.333
Best 5No. 31996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate13.20030%3.960
Best 10No. 31996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 282002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 532004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 842005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate37.40020%7.480

4.333 + 3.960 + 7.480= 15.773

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#153#112Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better16.38.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.613.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better29.5Better result for this metric.37.4
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#91Better result for this metric.#114
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0+7.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.7+5.6Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2+5.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.4+3.4
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,994 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,673 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons01Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons02Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Games1,0881,026
Minutes32,08534,776

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
True shooting percentage47.4%55.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile49.1%55.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Field-goal percentage47.4%48.3%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage13.7%31.4%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage41.4%76.9%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.8%25.2%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.34.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.6%Better result for this metric.13.8%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.5%Better result for this metric.11.0%
Rebounds per game9.6Better result for this metric.6.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%Better result for this metric.2.1%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.1%Better result for this metric.1.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ben Wallace and Grant Hill
MetricBen WallaceGrant Hill
Points per game5.716.7Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Grant Hill ranks higher in career impact.

Ben WallaceMetricGrant Hill
#153Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#112Leads
+5.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.1Leads
+4.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0Leads
+2,994 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,673 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ben WallaceMetricGrant Hill
724Listed-team regular-season wins761Leads
53.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage53.3%
6Leads50-win team seasons4
2Leads60-win team seasons0
9Playoff team seasons11Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Ben Wallace leads every available measure below.

Ben WallaceMetricGrant Hill
8Playoff appearances8
130LeadsPlayoff games39
76LeadsTeam playoff wins17
2LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ben WallaceMetricGrant Hill
4All-Star7Leads
0MVP0
5All-NBA5
6LeadsAll-Defense0
4LeadsDPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Ben WallaceGrant HillPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.