hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bernard King vs. Walter Davis: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Walter Davis ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#154Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#139Leads
+5.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.3
+3.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2
12.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.3Leads
+2,356 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,362 ptsLeads
1Top-10 impact seasons2Leads

Career Impact Rank places Walter Davis #139 and Bernard King #154. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Bernard King had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bernard-king/walter-davis/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBernard King19.967 · No. 154Walter Davis18.227 · No. 139

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bernard King

19.967 composite · No. 154 all-time

Bernard King's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 41984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.33350%6.167
Best 5No. 41984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.80030%6.540
Best 10No. 41984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.30020%7.260

6.167 + 6.540 + 7.260= 19.967

Walter Davis

18.227 composite · No. 139 all-time

Walter Davis's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.33350%5.167
Best 5No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate18.60030%5.580
Best 10No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate37.40020%7.480

5.167 + 5.580 + 7.480= 18.227

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#154#139Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better12.310.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better21.818.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better36.3Better result for this metric.37.4
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#138#137Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.7Better result for this metric.+4.3
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.1Better result for this metric.+3.9
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3Better result for this metric.+3.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.3Better result for this metric.+2.2
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,356 pts+2,362 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons11
Top-ten impact seasons12Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Games8741,033
Minutes29,41728,859

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
True shooting percentage56.1%Better result for this metric.55.8%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile56.5%56.6%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Field-goal percentage51.8%Better result for this metric.51.1%
Three-point percentage17.2%27.2%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage73.0%85.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.4%21.6%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game3.33.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.5%13.0%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.4%Better result for this metric.5.9%
Rebounds per game5.8Better result for this metric.3.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.4%2.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%Better result for this metric.0.3%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bernard King and Walter Davis
MetricBernard KingWalter Davis
Points per game22.5Better result for this metric.18.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Walter Davis ranks higher in career impact.

Bernard KingMetricWalter Davis
#154Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#139Leads
+5.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.3
+3.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2
+2,356 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,362 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Walter Davis leads every available measure below.

Bernard KingMetricWalter Davis
490Listed-team regular-season wins677Leads
42.7%Listed-team winning percentage51.6%Leads
050-win team seasons5Leads
060-win team seasons1Leads
5Playoff team seasons11Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Walter Davis leads every available measure below.

Bernard KingMetricWalter Davis
5Playoff appearances10Leads
28Playoff games78Leads
12Team playoff wins36Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bernard KingMetricWalter Davis
4All-Star6Leads
0MVP0
4LeadsAll-NBA2
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bernard KingWalter DavisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.