hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Darrell Griffith vs. Johnny Davis: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Johnny Davis ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#945Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#941Leads
+0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
67.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better75.7
+544 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+695 ptsLeads
146.6Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better121.0Leads
+1.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3

Career Impact Rank places Johnny Davis #941 and Darrell Griffith #945. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/darrell-griffith/johnny-davis-davisjo01/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDarrell Griffith90.120 · No. 945Johnny Davis89.753 · No. 941

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Darrell Griffith

90.120 composite · No. 945 all-time

Darrell Griffith's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 431986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate67.00050%33.500
Best 5No. 431986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1531989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate91.00030%27.300
Best 10No. 431986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1531989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1771988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1881987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2021980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2741990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate146.60020%29.320

33.500 + 27.300 + 29.320= 90.120

Johnny Davis

89.753 composite · No. 941 all-time

Johnny Davis's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 591982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate75.66750%37.833
Best 5No. 591982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1101978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1251984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate92.40030%27.720
Best 10No. 591982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1101978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1251984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1571977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1891976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate121.00020%24.200

37.833 + 27.720 + 24.200= 89.753

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#945#941Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better67.0Better result for this metric.75.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better91.0Better result for this metric.92.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better146.6121.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#736#628Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3+1.3
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Better result for this metric.+0.7
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3Better result for this metric.+0.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1-0.5Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+544 pts+695 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Games765750
Minutes21,40321,200

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
True shooting percentage50.9%51.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.5%51.3%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Field-goal percentage46.3%Better result for this metric.44.8%
Three-point percentage33.2%Better result for this metric.17.6%
Free-throw percentage70.7%82.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.5%23.2%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.14.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.3%Better result for this metric.13.9%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.3%Better result for this metric.3.8%
Rebounds per game3.3Better result for this metric.2.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.1%Better result for this metric.1.5%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.6%Better result for this metric.0.3%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Darrell Griffith and Johnny Davis
MetricDarrell GriffithJohnny Davis
Points per game16.2Better result for this metric.12.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Johnny Davis ranks higher in career impact.

Darrell GriffithMetricJohnny Davis
#945Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#941Leads
+1.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3
+0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
+544 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+695 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Darrell GriffithMetricJohnny Davis
420Listed-team regular-season wins459Leads
51.2%LeadsListed-team winning percentage50.9%
3Leads50-win team seasons2
060-win team seasons0
7Playoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Johnny Davis leads every available measure below.

Darrell GriffithMetricJohnny Davis
6Playoff appearances7Leads
37Playoff games43Leads
17Team playoff wins24Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Darrell GriffithMetricJohnny Davis
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
1Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Darrell GriffithJohnny DavisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.