hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Guy Rodgers vs. Monta Ellis: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Guy Rodgers ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#145LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#987
+0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9Leads
13.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better68.7
+1,340 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,066 pts
1LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0
34.0LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better146.1

Career Impact Rank places Guy Rodgers #145 and Monta Ellis #987. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/guy-rodgers/monta-ellis/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGuy Rodgers19.167 · No. 145Monta Ellis92.953 · No. 987

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Guy Rodgers

19.167 composite · No. 145 all-time

Guy Rodgers's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate13.33350%6.667
Best 5No. 101965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.00030%5.700
Best 10No. 101965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 771968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate34.00020%6.800

6.667 + 5.700 + 6.800= 19.167

Monta Ellis

92.953 composite · No. 987 all-time

Monta Ellis's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 652012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 692010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 722007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate68.66750%34.333
Best 5No. 652012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 692010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 722007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1402011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate98.00030%29.400
Best 10No. 652012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 692010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 722007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1402011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1752006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1832013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1952009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2062005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2122014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate146.10020%29.220

34.333 + 29.400 + 29.220= 92.953

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#145Better result for this metric.#987
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better13.3Better result for this metric.68.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.0Better result for this metric.98.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better34.0Better result for this metric.146.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#328Better result for this metric.#430
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7+1.7
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3+1.5Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8+0.9Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.0Better result for this metric.-0.0
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,340 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,066 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons1Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Games892833
Minutes28,66329,011

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
True shooting percentage42.6%52.3%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile42.4%52.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Field-goal percentage37.8%45.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable31.4%
Free-throw percentage72.1%77.2%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile36.4%Better result for this metric.21.7%
Assists per game7.8Better result for this metric.4.6
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable13.6%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable5.5%
Rebounds per game4.3Better result for this metric.3.5

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.4%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Guy Rodgers and Monta Ellis
MetricGuy RodgersMonta Ellis
Points per game11.717.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Guy Rodgers ranks higher in career impact.

Guy RodgersMetricMonta Ellis
#145LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#987
+1.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7
+0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9Leads
+1,340 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,066 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Guy RodgersMetricMonta Ellis
824LeadsListed-team regular-season wins493
0.6%Listed-team winning percentage47.7%Leads
7Leads50-win team seasons1
7Leads60-win team seasons0
7LeadsPlayoff team seasons6

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Guy Rodgers leads every available measure below.

Guy RodgersMetricMonta Ellis
6Playoff appearances6
46LeadsPlayoff games38
20LeadsTeam playoff wins12
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Guy Rodgers leads every available measure below.

Guy RodgersMetricMonta Ellis
4LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Guy RodgersMonta EllisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.