hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Horace Grant vs. Moses Malone: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Moses Malone ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#197Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#120Leads
+4.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.1Leads
+3.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.6Leads
19.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better11.7Leads
+2,660 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,474 ptsLeads
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Moses Malone #120 and Horace Grant #197. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/horace-grant/moses-malone/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedHorace Grant26.193 · No. 197Moses Malone16.333 · No. 120

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Horace Grant

26.193 composite · No. 197 all-time

Horace Grant's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 121991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.66750%9.833
Best 5No. 121991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate25.80030%7.740
Best 10No. 121991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate43.10020%8.620

9.833 + 7.740 + 8.620= 26.193

Moses Malone

16.333 composite · No. 120 all-time

Moses Malone's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.66750%5.833
Best 5No. 61981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.00030%4.500
Best 10No. 61981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate30.00020%6.000

5.833 + 4.500 + 6.000= 16.333

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#197#120Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.711.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better25.815.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better43.130.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#115#62Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.9+5.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.9+4.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3+3.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5+2.6Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,660 pts+3,474 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Games1,1651,329
Minutes38,62145,071

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
True shooting percentage54.0%56.9%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.6%57.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Field-goal percentage50.9%Better result for this metric.49.1%
Three-point percentage6.3%10.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage69.2%76.9%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.7%Better result for this metric.6.4%
Assists per game2.2Better result for this metric.1.4
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.5%Better result for this metric.14.0%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.7%20.0%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game8.112.2Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.2%2.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Horace Grant and Moses Malone
MetricHorace GrantMoses Malone
Points per game11.220.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Moses Malone ranks higher in career impact.

Horace GrantMetricMoses Malone
#197Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#120Leads
+4.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.1Leads
+3.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.6Leads
+2,660 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,474 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Horace GrantMetricMoses Malone
871Listed-team regular-season wins872Leads
64.0%LeadsListed-team winning percentage53.2%
10Leads50-win team seasons6
3Leads60-win team seasons2
16LeadsPlayoff team seasons14

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Horace Grant leads every available measure below.

Horace GrantMetricMoses Malone
13LeadsPlayoff appearances12
170LeadsPlayoff games94
111LeadsTeam playoff wins49
5LeadsFinals appearances2
4LeadsChampionships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Horace GrantMetricMoses Malone
1All-Star12Leads
0MVP3Leads
0All-NBA8Leads
4LeadsAll-Defense2
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Horace GrantMoses MalonePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18
S19

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.