hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jack Twyman vs. Red Kerr: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Red Kerr ranks higher in career impact

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Red Kerr

Red Kerr

1954–55 to 1965–66 · 12 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#85Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#79Leads
+2.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2
+2.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9
10.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better9.7Leads
+1,924 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,130 ptsLeads
3LeadsTop-10 impact seasons2

Career Impact Rank places Red Kerr #79 and Jack Twyman #85. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Jack Twyman had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jack-twyman/red-kerr/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJack Twyman12.700 · No. 85Red Kerr11.573 · No. 79

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jack Twyman

12.700 composite · No. 85 all-time

Jack Twyman's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.00050%5.000
Best 5No. 101958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.80030%3.240
Best 10No. 101958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate22.30020%4.460

5.000 + 3.240 + 4.460= 12.700

Red Kerr

11.573 composite · No. 79 all-time

Red Kerr's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 81965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9.66750%4.833
Best 5No. 81965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.80030%3.240
Best 10No. 81965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate17.50020%3.500

4.833 + 3.240 + 3.500= 11.573

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jack Twyman and Red Kerr
MetricJack TwymanRed Kerr
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#85#79Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.09.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.810.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better22.317.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jack Twyman and Red Kerr
MetricJack TwymanRed Kerr
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#196#163Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.3Better result for this metric.+2.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2Better result for this metric.+2.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0Better result for this metric.+1.9
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0+1.2Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,924 pts+2,130 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons3Better result for this metric.2

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jack Twyman and Red Kerr
MetricJack TwymanRed Kerr
Games823905
Minutes26,14727,784

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jack Twyman and Red Kerr
MetricJack TwymanRed Kerr
True shooting percentage50.2%Better result for this metric.46.7%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.0%Better result for this metric.47.4%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jack Twyman and Red Kerr
MetricJack TwymanRed Kerr
Field-goal percentage45.0%Better result for this metric.41.8%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage77.8%Better result for this metric.72.3%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jack Twyman and Red Kerr
MetricJack TwymanRed Kerr
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.9%15.6%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.3Better result for this metric.2.2

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jack Twyman and Red Kerr
MetricJack TwymanRed Kerr
Rebounds per game6.611.2Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jack Twyman and Red Kerr
MetricJack TwymanRed Kerr
Points per game19.2Better result for this metric.13.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Red Kerr ranks higher in career impact.

Jack TwymanMetricRed Kerr
#85Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#79Leads
+2.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2
+2.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9
+1,924 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,130 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jack TwymanMetricRed Kerr
466Listed-team regular-season wins558Leads
1.2%Listed-team winning percentage1.4%Leads
3Leads50-win team seasons2
260-win team seasons2
6Playoff team seasons12Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Red Kerr leads every available measure below.

Jack TwymanMetricRed Kerr
6Playoff appearances12Leads
34Playoff games76Leads
14Team playoff wins37Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Jack Twyman leads every available measure below.

Jack TwymanMetricRed Kerr
6LeadsAll-Star3
0MVP0
2LeadsAll-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jack TwymanRed KerrPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.