hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jim King vs. Walt Hazzard: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Walt Hazzard ranks higher in career impact

Jim King

1963–64 to 1972–73 · 10 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#394Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#388Leads
+0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Leads
-0.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Leads
36.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better34.7Leads
+346 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+667 ptsLeads
73.4LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better77.3

Career Impact Rank places Walt Hazzard #388 and Jim King #394. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jim-king/walt-hazzard/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJim King47.007 · No. 394Walt Hazzard46.593 · No. 388

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jim King

47.007 composite · No. 394 all-time

Jim King's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 241966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.33350%18.167
Best 5No. 241966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate47.20030%14.160
Best 10No. 241966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 971972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1141968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 12273.40020%14.680

18.167 + 14.160 + 14.680= 47.007

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 122, this player's stored replacement finish.

Walt Hazzard

46.593 composite · No. 388 all-time

Walt Hazzard's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 171967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate34.66750%17.333
Best 5No. 171967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate46.00030%13.800
Best 10No. 171967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1241973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1371972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate77.30020%15.460

17.333 + 13.800 + 15.460= 46.593

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#394#388Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better36.334.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better47.246.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better73.4Better result for this metric.77.3
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#951#651Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7+1.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2+0.5Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2-0.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-1.0
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+346 pts+667 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Games607724
Minutes11,18719,202

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
True shooting percentage47.4%49.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile47.5%47.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Field-goal percentage41.8%44.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage78.2%Better result for this metric.75.7%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.3%24.7%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.34.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable21.0%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.5%4.8%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.53.0Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.0%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jim King and Walt Hazzard
MetricJim KingWalt Hazzard
Points per game7.212.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Walt Hazzard ranks higher in career impact.

Jim KingMetricWalt Hazzard
#394Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#388Leads
+0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Leads
-0.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Leads
+346 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+667 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jim KingMetricWalt Hazzard
857Listed-team regular-season wins897Leads
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage0.4%
1050-win team seasons11Leads
1060-win team seasons11Leads
9LeadsPlayoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Jim King leads every available measure below.

Jim KingMetricWalt Hazzard
9LeadsPlayoff appearances7
73LeadsPlayoff games58
35LeadsTeam playoff wins27
3LeadsFinals appearances2
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jim KingMetricWalt Hazzard
1All-Star1
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jim KingWalt HazzardPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.