hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Eddie Johnson vs. Joe Smith: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Eddie Johnson ranks higher in career impact

Joe Smith

1995–96 to 2010–11 · 16 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1231LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1496
108.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better138.7
+423 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+280 pts
146.4LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better180.7
+0.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6
-0.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5

Career Impact Rank places Eddie Johnson #1231 and Joe Smith #1496. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Joe Smith had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/eddie-johnson-johnsed03/joe-smith/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedEddie Johnson120.000 · No. 1,231Joe Smith151.433 · No. 1,496

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Eddie Johnson

120.000 composite · No. 1,231 all-time

Eddie Johnson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 751988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate108.00050%54.000
Best 5No. 751988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1421982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate122.40030%36.720
Best 10No. 751988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1421982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1611984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1611985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1621993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate146.40020%29.280

54.000 + 36.720 + 29.280= 120.000

Joe Smith

151.433 composite · No. 1,496 all-time

Joe Smith's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1021998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1491995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1652007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate138.66750%69.333
Best 5No. 1021998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1491995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1652007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1692003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1812001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate153.20030%45.960
Best 10No. 1021998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1491995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1652007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1692003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1812001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2082004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2082008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2112005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2142000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate180.70020%36.140

69.333 + 45.960 + 36.140= 151.433

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1231Better result for this metric.#1496
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better108.0Better result for this metric.138.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better122.4Better result for this metric.153.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better146.4Better result for this metric.180.7
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#858Better result for this metric.#1039
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6+0.6
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1-0.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5-0.5
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0-1.0
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+423 ptsBetter result for this metric.+280 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Games1,1991,030
Minutes32,60427,022

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
True shooting percentage53.3%Better result for this metric.51.3%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.6%Better result for this metric.51.7%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Field-goal percentage47.2%Better result for this metric.45.5%
Three-point percentage33.5%Better result for this metric.23.8%
Free-throw percentage84.0%Better result for this metric.79.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.8%Better result for this metric.6.3%
Assists per game2.1Better result for this metric.1.0
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.3%9.6%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.4%13.9%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.06.4Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%1.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%2.3%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Eddie Johnson and Joe Smith
MetricEddie JohnsonJoe Smith
Points per game16.0Better result for this metric.10.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Eddie Johnson ranks higher in career impact.

Eddie JohnsonMetricJoe Smith
#1231LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1496
+0.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6
-0.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5
+423 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+280 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Eddie JohnsonMetricJoe Smith
806Listed-team regular-season wins816Leads
52.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage48.3%
650-win team seasons6
060-win team seasons1Leads
12LeadsPlayoff team seasons11

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Eddie Johnson leads every available measure below.

Eddie JohnsonMetricJoe Smith
10Playoff appearances10
89LeadsPlayoff games62
45LeadsTeam playoff wins31
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Eddie JohnsonMetricJoe Smith
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Eddie JohnsonJoe SmithPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.