hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Markelle Fultz vs. Wes Matthews: Career comparison

hussEyquationEarly career · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Wes Matthews ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2259Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1520Leads
+0.6LeadsPeak box impact so farEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1
-0.7LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.6
#125Best league finish#95Leads
+99 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+117 ptsLeads
260Games465Leads

Career Impact Rank places Wes Matthews #1520 and Markelle Fultz #2259. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Markelle Fultz had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Early career · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/markelle-fultz/wes-matthews/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMarkelle Fultz244.227 · No. 2,259Wes Matthews154.967 · No. 1,520

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Markelle Fultz

244.227 composite · No. 2,259 all-time

Markelle Fultz's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1252022–23No. 1952019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2782023–24199.33350%99.667
Best 5No. 1252022–23No. 1952019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2782023–242 open slots × No. 372268.40030%80.520
Best 10No. 1252022–23No. 1952019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2782023–247 open slots × No. 372320.20020%64.040

99.667 + 80.520 + 64.040= 244.227

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 372, this player's stored replacement finish.

Wes Matthews

154.967 composite · No. 1,520 all-time

Wes Matthews's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 951985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate140.33350%70.167
Best 5No. 951985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1741981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate153.20030%45.960
Best 10No. 951985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1741981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1991987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2121986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 255194.20020%38.840

70.167 + 45.960 + 38.840= 154.967

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 255, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#2259#1520Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better199.3140.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better268.4153.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better320.2194.2Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1420#1376Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6Better result for this metric.+0.1
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7Better result for this metric.-0.9
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-1.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+99 pts+117 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Games260465
Minutes6,1599,305

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
True shooting percentage51.2%53.0%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.4%Better result for this metric.52.1%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Field-goal percentage46.9%47.8%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage28.0%Better result for this metric.22.5%
Free-throw percentage73.2%78.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile26.2%28.3%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game4.3Better result for this metric.4.2
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.5%Better result for this metric.21.0%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.6%Better result for this metric.4.0%
Rebounds per game3.1Better result for this metric.1.3

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%2.3%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%Better result for this metric.0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Markelle Fultz and Wes Matthews
MetricMarkelle FultzWes Matthews
Points per game10.2Better result for this metric.7.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Wes Matthews ranks higher in career impact so far.

Markelle FultzMetricWes Matthews
#2259Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1520Leads
+0.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
+99 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+117 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Wes Matthews leads every available measure below.

Markelle FultzMetricWes Matthews
346Listed-team regular-season wins488Leads
48.1%Listed-team winning percentage54.1%Leads
250-win team seasons3Leads
060-win team seasons2Leads
5Playoff team seasons8Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Wes Matthews leads every available measure below.

Markelle FultzMetricWes Matthews
3Playoff appearances7Leads
15Playoff games38Leads
9Team playoff wins34Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships2Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Markelle FultzMetricWes Matthews
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Markelle FultzWes MatthewsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.