hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Michael Smith vs. Scott Burrell: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Scott Burrell ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1198Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#742Leads
+0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.5Leads
+0.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6Leads
96.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better36.7Leads
+419 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+407 pts
181.6Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better179.1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Scott Burrell #742 and Michael Smith #1198. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Michael Smith had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/michael-smith-smithmi02/scott-burrell/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMichael Smith116.273 · No. 1,198Scott Burrell75.213 · No. 742

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Michael Smith

116.273 composite · No. 1,198 all-time

Michael Smith's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 961995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate96.66750%48.333
Best 5No. 961995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate105.40030%31.620
Best 10No. 961995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1861994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 319181.60020%36.320

48.333 + 31.620 + 36.320= 116.273

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 319, this player's stored replacement finish.

Scott Burrell

75.213 composite · No. 742 all-time

Scott Burrell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 221997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.66750%18.333
Best 5No. 221997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1481995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate70.20030%21.060
Best 10No. 221997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1481995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2401993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2461996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 318179.10020%35.820

18.333 + 21.060 + 35.820= 75.213

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 318, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1198#742Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better96.736.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better105.470.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better181.6179.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#866Better result for this metric.#880
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7+3.5Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6+2.5Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4+1.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+419 ptsBetter result for this metric.+407 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Games449383
Minutes10,5527,592

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
True shooting percentage55.2%Better result for this metric.52.0%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile55.6%Better result for this metric.51.1%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Field-goal percentage53.8%Better result for this metric.41.8%
Three-point percentage14.3%37.3%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage52.9%72.3%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.5%10.7%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.5Better result for this metric.1.4
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile18.7%12.1%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.5%Better result for this metric.9.9%
Rebounds per game7.1Better result for this metric.3.5

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.8%2.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Michael Smith and Scott Burrell
MetricMichael SmithScott Burrell
Points per game5.66.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Scott Burrell ranks higher in career impact.

Michael SmithMetricScott Burrell
#1198Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#742Leads
+0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.5Leads
+0.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6Leads
+419 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+407 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Scott Burrell leads every available measure below.

Michael SmithMetricScott Burrell
214Listed-team regular-season wins371Leads
34.3%Listed-team winning percentage52.5%Leads
050-win team seasons3Leads
060-win team seasons1Leads
1Playoff team seasons4Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Scott Burrell leads every available measure below.

Michael SmithMetricScott Burrell
1Playoff appearances2Leads
4Playoff games23Leads
1Team playoff wins21Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Michael SmithMetricScott Burrell
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Michael SmithScott BurrellPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.