hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Mo Bamba vs. Roy Tarpley: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Roy Tarpley ranks higher in career impact so far

Mo Bamba

2018–19 to 2025–26 · 8 seasons · active

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1114Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1004Leads
+2.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Leads
+1.2LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4
66.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better63.0Leads
+344 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+329 pts
215.9Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better178.9Leads

Career Impact Rank places Roy Tarpley #1004 and Mo Bamba #1114. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Mo Bamba had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/mo-bamba/roy-tarpley/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMo Bamba105.507 · No. 1,114Roy Tarpley95.120 · No. 1,004

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Mo Bamba

105.507 composite · No. 1,114 all-time

Mo Bamba's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 562020–21No. 622019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 812021–2266.33350%33.167
Best 5No. 562020–21No. 622019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 812021–22No. 1202022–23No. 1672018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate97.20030%29.160
Best 10No. 562020–21No. 622019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 812021–22No. 1202022–23No. 1672018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1892023–244 open slots × No. 371215.90020%43.180

33.167 + 29.160 + 43.180= 105.507

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 371, this player's stored replacement finish.

Roy Tarpley

95.120 composite · No. 1,004 all-time

Roy Tarpley's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 221988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate63.00050%31.500
Best 5No. 221988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate92.80030%27.840
Best 10No. 221988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 265178.90020%35.780

31.500 + 27.840 + 35.780= 95.120

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 265, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1114#1004Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better66.363.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better97.292.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better215.9178.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#955Better result for this metric.#971
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.3+2.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Better result for this metric.+1.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Better result for this metric.+0.4
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+344 ptsBetter result for this metric.+329 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Games368280
Minutes6,1597,476

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
True shooting percentage56.7%Better result for this metric.52.3%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile56.6%Better result for this metric.52.6%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Field-goal percentage47.7%48.3%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage35.6%Better result for this metric.17.6%
Free-throw percentage68.2%74.4%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.7%Better result for this metric.5.8%
Assists per game0.81.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.9%Better result for this metric.14.2%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.4%20.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game5.410.0Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%2.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.9%Better result for this metric.2.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Mo Bamba and Roy Tarpley
MetricMo BambaRoy Tarpley
Points per game6.712.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Roy Tarpley ranks higher in career impact so far.

Mo BambaMetricRoy Tarpley
#1114Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1004Leads
+2.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Leads
+1.2LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4
+344 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+329 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Mo BambaMetricRoy Tarpley
381LeadsListed-team regular-season wins257
43.1%Listed-team winning percentage52.2%Leads
150-win team seasons2Leads
060-win team seasons0
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons3

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Roy Tarpley leads every available measure below.

Mo BambaMetricRoy Tarpley
1Playoff appearances3Leads
3Playoff games24Leads
8Team playoff wins11Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Mo BambaMetricRoy Tarpley
Not availableAll-Star0
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Mo BambaRoy TarpleyPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.