hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Patrick Ewing vs. Ron Harper: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Patrick Ewing ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#104LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#130
+5.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2
+4.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2
12.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better14.0
+3,683 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,916 pts
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Patrick Ewing #104 and Ron Harper #130. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/patrick-ewing-ewingpa01/ron-harper/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedPatrick Ewing14.327 · No. 104Ron Harper17.300 · No. 130

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Patrick Ewing

14.327 composite · No. 104 all-time

Patrick Ewing's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 121987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.33350%6.167
Best 5No. 121987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate13.20030%3.960
Best 10No. 121987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.00020%4.200

6.167 + 3.960 + 4.200= 14.327

Ron Harper

17.300 composite · No. 130 all-time

Ron Harper's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.00050%7.000
Best 5No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate17.40030%5.220
Best 10No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate25.40020%5.080

7.000 + 5.220 + 5.080= 17.300

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#104Better result for this metric.#130
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better12.3Better result for this metric.14.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better13.2Better result for this metric.17.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better21.0Better result for this metric.25.4
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#53Better result for this metric.#93
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.7Better result for this metric.+5.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0Better result for this metric.+4.8
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.6Better result for this metric.+4.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8Better result for this metric.+3.4
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,683 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,916 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Games1,1831,009
Minutes40,59431,199

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
True shooting percentage55.3%Better result for this metric.51.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile56.8%Better result for this metric.51.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Field-goal percentage50.4%Better result for this metric.44.6%
Three-point percentage15.2%28.9%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage74.0%Better result for this metric.72.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.3%19.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.93.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.6%13.2%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.7%Better result for this metric.7.6%
Rebounds per game9.8Better result for this metric.4.3

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.4%2.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.1%Better result for this metric.1.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Patrick Ewing and Ron Harper
MetricPatrick EwingRon Harper
Points per game21.0Better result for this metric.13.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Patrick Ewing ranks higher in career impact.

Patrick EwingMetricRon Harper
#104LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#130
+5.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2
+4.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2
+3,683 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,916 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Patrick EwingMetricRon Harper
756LeadsListed-team regular-season wins732
55.5%Listed-team winning percentage57.2%Leads
7Leads50-win team seasons6
160-win team seasons4Leads
14LeadsPlayoff team seasons11

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Patrick EwingMetricRon Harper
14LeadsPlayoff appearances10
139LeadsPlayoff games112
81Team playoff wins88Leads
2Finals appearances5Leads
0Championships5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Patrick EwingMetricRon Harper
11All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
7All-NBANot available
3All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
1Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Patrick EwingRon HarperPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.