hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Scott Burrell vs. Todd Day: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Scott Burrell ranks higher in career impact

Todd Day

1992–93 to 2000–01 · 8 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#742LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1259
+3.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2
+1.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1
36.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better95.3
+407 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+423 ptsLeads
179.1LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better201.0

Career Impact Rank places Scott Burrell #742 and Todd Day #1259. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Todd Day had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/scott-burrell/todd-day/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedScott Burrell75.213 · No. 742Todd Day122.787 · No. 1,259

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Scott Burrell

75.213 composite · No. 742 all-time

Scott Burrell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 221997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.66750%18.333
Best 5No. 221997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1481995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate70.20030%21.060
Best 10No. 221997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1481995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2401993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2461996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 318179.10020%35.820

18.333 + 21.060 + 35.820= 75.213

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 318, this player's stored replacement finish.

Todd Day

122.787 composite · No. 1,259 all-time

Todd Day's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 751999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 941996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate95.33350%47.667
Best 5No. 751999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 941996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1551992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate116.40030%34.920
Best 10No. 751999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 941996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1551992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 314.5201.00020%40.200

47.667 + 34.920 + 40.200= 122.787

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 314.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#742Better result for this metric.#1259
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better36.7Better result for this metric.95.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better70.2Better result for this metric.116.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better179.1Better result for this metric.201.0
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#880#861Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.5Better result for this metric.+1.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5Better result for this metric.+0.7
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6Better result for this metric.+0.1
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+407 pts+423 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Games383483
Minutes7,59212,214

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
True shooting percentage52.0%Better result for this metric.51.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.1%51.3%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Field-goal percentage41.8%Better result for this metric.40.6%
Three-point percentage37.3%Better result for this metric.34.5%
Free-throw percentage72.3%73.9%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.7%Better result for this metric.9.5%
Assists per game1.41.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.1%11.0%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.9%Better result for this metric.7.8%
Rebounds per game3.5Better result for this metric.3.4

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.4%Better result for this metric.2.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%1.7%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Scott Burrell and Todd Day
MetricScott BurrellTodd Day
Points per game6.912.3Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Scott Burrell ranks higher in career impact.

Scott BurrellMetricTodd Day
#742LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1259
+3.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2
+1.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1
+407 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+423 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Scott Burrell leads every available measure below.

Scott BurrellMetricTodd Day
371LeadsListed-team regular-season wins310
52.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage42.0%
3Leads50-win team seasons2
1Leads60-win team seasons0
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons3

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Scott Burrell leads every available measure below.

Scott BurrellMetricTodd Day
2LeadsPlayoff appearances1
23LeadsPlayoff games9
21LeadsTeam playoff wins4
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Scott BurrellMetricTodd Day
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Scott BurrellTodd DayPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.