hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Al Attles vs. Justin Holiday: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Al Attles ranks higher in career impact

Al Attles

1960–61 to 1970–71 · 11 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#278LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1562
+0.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Leads
+0.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
28.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better137.3
+600 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+358 pts
54.3LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better215.1

Career Impact Rank places Al Attles #278 and Justin Holiday #1562. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Justin Holiday had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/al-attles/justin-holiday/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedAl Attles35.633 · No. 278Justin Holiday160.647 · No. 1,562

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Al Attles

35.633 composite · No. 278 all-time

Al Attles's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 221965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate28.66750%14.333
Best 5No. 221965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate34.80030%10.440
Best 10No. 221965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1251969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate54.30020%10.860

14.333 + 10.440 + 10.860= 35.633

Justin Holiday

160.647 composite · No. 1,562 all-time

Justin Holiday's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 932019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1332016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1862014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate137.33350%68.667
Best 5No. 932019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1332016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1862014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1982020–21No. 2062017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate163.20030%48.960
Best 10No. 932019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1332016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1862014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1982020–21No. 2062017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2242018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2342015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2352023–24No. 2822021–22No. 3602022–23215.10020%43.020

68.667 + 48.960 + 43.020= 160.647

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#278Better result for this metric.#1562
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better28.7Better result for this metric.137.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better34.8Better result for this metric.163.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better54.3Better result for this metric.215.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#694Better result for this metric.#936
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8+1.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2+0.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.0Better result for this metric.-0.1
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8Better result for this metric.-1.0
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+600 ptsBetter result for this metric.+358 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Games711680
Minutes17,82615,717

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
True shooting percentage48.9%53.7%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.6%53.6%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Field-goal percentage45.1%Better result for this metric.40.0%
Three-point percentageUnavailable36.5%
Free-throw percentage63.2%81.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile21.3%Better result for this metric.8.8%
Assists per game3.5Better result for this metric.1.4
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable9.6%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable6.1%
Rebounds per game3.5Better result for this metric.2.7

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.0%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Al Attles and Justin Holiday
MetricAl AttlesJustin Holiday
Points per game8.9Better result for this metric.8.0

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Al Attles ranks higher in career impact.

Al AttlesMetricJustin Holiday
#278LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1562
+0.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Leads
+0.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
+600 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+358 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Al AttlesMetricJustin Holiday
743LeadsListed-team regular-season wins574
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage47.4%Leads
7Leads50-win team seasons2
7Leads60-win team seasons1
7LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Al AttlesMetricJustin Holiday
7LeadsPlayoff appearances3
62LeadsPlayoff games21
27LeadsTeam playoff wins23
2LeadsFinals appearances1
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Al AttlesMetricJustin Holiday
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Al AttlesJustin HolidayPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.