hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Al Ferrari vs. Kevin Stacom: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Al Ferrari ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#699LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1826
-2.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7Leads
-3.1Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.0Leads
#65LeadsBest league finish#131
-222 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-91 ptsLeads
371LeadsGames347

Career Impact Rank places Al Ferrari #699 and Kevin Stacom #1826. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Kevin Stacom had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/al-ferrari/kevin-stacom/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedAl Ferrari71.967 · No. 699Kevin Stacom193.063 · No. 1,826

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Al Ferrari

71.967 composite · No. 699 all-time

Al Ferrari's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 651960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate69.33350%34.667
Best 5No. 651960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate73.00030%21.900
Best 10No. 651960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 8177.00020%15.400

34.667 + 21.900 + 15.400= 71.967

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 81, this player's stored replacement finish.

Kevin Stacom

193.063 composite · No. 1,826 all-time

Kevin Stacom's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1311975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1941977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate179.66750%89.833
Best 5No. 1311975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1941977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2261978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 233.5199.70030%59.910
Best 10No. 1311975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1941977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2261978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 233.5216.60020%43.320

89.833 + 59.910 + 43.320= 193.063

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 233.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#699Better result for this metric.#1826
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better69.3Better result for this metric.179.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better73.0Better result for this metric.199.7
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better77.0Better result for this metric.216.6
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4728#4471Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.6-1.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.9-2.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.1Unavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-222 pts-91 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Games371347
Minutes7,5824,539

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
True shooting percentage44.5%44.9%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile45.3%Better result for this metric.44.3%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Field-goal percentage36.8%41.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable50.0%
Free-throw percentage76.0%76.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable16.4%
Assists per game2.5Better result for this metric.1.5
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable14.8%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable5.6%
Rebounds per game2.2Better result for this metric.1.5

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.1%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.1%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Al Ferrari and Kevin Stacom
MetricAl FerrariKevin Stacom
Points per game6.8Better result for this metric.5.1

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Al Ferrari ranks higher in career impact.

Al FerrariMetricKevin Stacom
#699LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1826
-2.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7Leads
-3.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
-222 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-91 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Al FerrariMetricKevin Stacom
233Listed-team regular-season wins362Leads
50.9%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.9%
150-win team seasons3Leads
060-win team seasons2Leads
4Playoff team seasons4

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Al FerrariMetricKevin Stacom
4LeadsPlayoff appearances3
33LeadsPlayoff games26
18Team playoff wins23Leads
2LeadsFinals appearances1
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Al FerrariMetricKevin Stacom
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Al FerrariKevin StacomPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.