Al Ferrari
1955–56 to 1962–63 · 6 seasons
NBA player comparison
Al Ferrari vs. Pat Riley: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Al Ferrari ranks higher in career impact
Pat Riley
1967–68 to 1975–76 · 9 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#699LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1278
-2.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.4Leads
-3.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.7Leads
69.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better112.0
-222 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-298 pts
77.0LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better151.4
Career Impact Rank places Al Ferrari #699 and Pat Riley #1278. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Pat Riley had the higher single-season impact estimate.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedAl Ferrari71.967 · No. 699Pat Riley124.980 · No. 1,278
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Al Ferrari
71.967 composite · No. 699 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 651960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 69.333 | 50% | 34.667 |
| Best 5No. 651960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 73.000 | 30% | 21.900 |
| Best 10No. 651960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 81 | 77.000 | 20% | 15.400 |
34.667 + 21.900 + 15.400= 71.967
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 81, this player's stored replacement finish.
Pat Riley
124.980 composite · No. 1,278 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 1061967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 112.000 | 50% | 56.000 |
| Best 5No. 1061967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1641973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 129.000 | 30% | 38.700 |
| Best 10No. 1061967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1641973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1661972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1771974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1891975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 169 | 151.400 | 20% | 30.280 |
56.000 + 38.700 + 30.280= 124.980
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 169, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #699Better result for this metric. | #1278 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 69.3Better result for this metric. | 112.0 |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 73.0Better result for this metric. | 129.0 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 77.0Better result for this metric. | 151.4 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #4728Better result for this metric. | #4768 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -2.6 | -2.4Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -2.9 | -2.5Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -3.1 | -2.7Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | -222 ptsBetter result for this metric. | -298 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 371 | 528 |
| Minutes | 7,582 | 8,187 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 44.5% | 45.1%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 45.3% | 45.3% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 36.8% | 41.4%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 76.0%Better result for this metric. | 70.5% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 15.9% |
| Assists per game | 2.5Better result for this metric. | 1.7 |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 4.4% |
| Rebounds per game | 2.2Better result for this metric. | 1.6 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 1.5% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | Unavailable | 0.2% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Al Ferrari | Pat Riley |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 6.8 | 7.4Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Al Ferrari ranks higher in career impact.
Al FerrariMetricPat Riley
#699LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1278
-2.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.4Leads
-3.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.7Leads
-222 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-298 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Al FerrariMetricPat Riley
233Listed-team regular-season wins820Leads
50.9%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
150-win team seasons10Leads
060-win team seasons10Leads
4Playoff team seasons6Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Pat Riley leads every available measure below.
Al FerrariMetricPat Riley
4Playoff appearances6Leads
33Playoff games44Leads
18Team playoff wins39Leads
2Finals appearances3Leads
0Championships1Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Al FerrariMetricPat Riley
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Al FerrariPat RileyPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Al FerrariNBA seasonPat Riley
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
No season
Season 7No season
Season 8Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.