hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Alex English vs. Ron Harper: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Alex English ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#106LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#130
+4.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2Leads
+3.7Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2Leads
11.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better14.0
+3,632 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,916 pts
2LeadsTop-10 impact seasons1

Career Impact Rank places Alex English #106 and Ron Harper #130. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Ron Harper had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/alex-english/ron-harper/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedAlex English14.820 · No. 106Ron Harper17.300 · No. 130

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Alex English

14.820 composite · No. 106 all-time

Alex English's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.00050%5.500
Best 5No. 61982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.60030%4.380
Best 10No. 61982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.70020%4.940

5.500 + 4.380 + 4.940= 14.820

Ron Harper

17.300 composite · No. 130 all-time

Ron Harper's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.00050%7.000
Best 5No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate17.40030%5.220
Best 10No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate25.40020%5.080

7.000 + 5.220 + 5.080= 17.300

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#106Better result for this metric.#130
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better11.0Better result for this metric.14.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better14.6Better result for this metric.17.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better24.7Better result for this metric.25.4
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#55Better result for this metric.#93
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.6+5.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.0+4.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7+4.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.9+3.4Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,632 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,916 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons2Better result for this metric.1

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Games1,1931,009
Minutes38,06331,199

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
True shooting percentage55.0%Better result for this metric.51.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile55.5%Better result for this metric.51.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Field-goal percentage50.7%Better result for this metric.44.6%
Three-point percentage21.7%28.9%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage83.2%Better result for this metric.72.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile18.1%19.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game3.63.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.7%Better result for this metric.13.2%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.7%Better result for this metric.7.6%
Rebounds per game5.5Better result for this metric.4.3

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%2.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.2%1.6%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Alex English and Ron Harper
MetricAlex EnglishRon Harper
Points per game21.5Better result for this metric.13.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Alex English ranks higher in career impact.

Alex EnglishMetricRon Harper
#106LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#130
+4.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2Leads
+3.7Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2Leads
+3,632 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,916 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Ron Harper leads every available measure below.

Alex EnglishMetricRon Harper
650Listed-team regular-season wins732Leads
49.5%Listed-team winning percentage57.2%Leads
250-win team seasons6Leads
060-win team seasons4Leads
10Playoff team seasons11Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Ron Harper leads every available measure below.

Alex EnglishMetricRon Harper
10Playoff appearances10
68Playoff games112Leads
29Team playoff wins88Leads
0Finals appearances5Leads
0Championships5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Alex EnglishMetricRon Harper
8All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
3All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Alex EnglishRon HarperPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.