hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Armen Gilliam vs. Micheal Williams: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Armen Gilliam ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#719LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#725
+1.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2Leads
-0.6Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6Leads
#49Best league finish#20Leads
+874 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+821 pts
929LeadsGames413

Career Impact Rank places Armen Gilliam #719 and Micheal Williams #725. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Micheal Williams had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/armen-gilliam/micheal-williams/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedArmen Gilliam73.213 · No. 719Micheal Williams73.873 · No. 725

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Armen Gilliam

73.213 composite · No. 719 all-time

Armen Gilliam's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 491993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate54.66750%27.333
Best 5No. 491993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1061991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate75.00030%22.500
Best 10No. 491993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1061991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1541997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1691998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1721990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1901988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate116.90020%23.380

27.333 + 22.500 + 23.380= 73.213

Micheal Williams

73.873 composite · No. 725 all-time

Micheal Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 201992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.66750%12.333
Best 5No. 201992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 29380.60030%24.180
Best 10No. 201992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 293186.80020%37.360

12.333 + 24.180 + 37.360= 73.873

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 293, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#719Better result for this metric.#725
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better54.724.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better75.0Better result for this metric.80.6
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better116.9Better result for this metric.186.8
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#518Better result for this metric.#542
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8+3.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7+2.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1Unavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.0Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+874 ptsBetter result for this metric.+821 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Games929413
Minutes26,42110,403

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
True shooting percentage54.7%57.3%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile55.2%58.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Field-goal percentage48.9%Better result for this metric.46.4%
Three-point percentage0.0%22.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage77.6%86.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.9%34.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.25.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.8%Better result for this metric.18.8%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.3%Better result for this metric.5.9%
Rebounds per game6.9Better result for this metric.2.5

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%3.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%Better result for this metric.0.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Armen Gilliam and Micheal Williams
MetricArmen GilliamMicheal Williams
Points per game13.7Better result for this metric.11.0

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Armen Gilliam ranks higher in career impact.

Armen GilliamMetricMicheal Williams
#719LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#725
+1.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2Leads
+1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+874 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+821 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Armen GilliamMetricMicheal Williams
544LeadsListed-team regular-season wins371
45.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage42.6%
3Leads50-win team seasons2
060-win team seasons1Leads
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Armen GilliamMetricMicheal Williams
5LeadsPlayoff appearances4
34LeadsPlayoff games16
16Team playoff wins19Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Armen GilliamMetricMicheal Williams
Not availableAll-Star0
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense1
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Armen GilliamMicheal WilliamsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.