hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Art Williams vs. Brian Taylor: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Art Williams ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#251LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#787
+2.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0Leads
+1.4LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7
18.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better39.7
+688 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+662 pts
76.5LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better165.2

Career Impact Rank places Art Williams #251 and Brian Taylor #787. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Brian Taylor had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/art-williams/brian-taylor/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedArt Williams32.733 · No. 251Brian Taylor78.493 · No. 787

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Art Williams

32.733 composite · No. 251 all-time

Art Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 161969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate18.66750%9.333
Best 5No. 161969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.00030%8.100
Best 10No. 161969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 16676.50020%15.300

9.333 + 8.100 + 15.300= 32.733

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 166, this player's stored replacement finish.

Brian Taylor

78.493 composite · No. 787 all-time

Brian Taylor's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.66750%19.833
Best 5No. 141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1441981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1641977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate85.40030%25.620
Best 10No. 141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1441981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1641977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 245165.20020%33.040

19.833 + 25.620 + 33.040= 78.493

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 245, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#251Better result for this metric.#787
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better18.7Better result for this metric.39.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better27.0Better result for this metric.85.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better76.5Better result for this metric.165.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#630Better result for this metric.#652
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4+3.0Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0Better result for this metric.+1.9
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Better result for this metric.+0.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+688 ptsBetter result for this metric.+662 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Games541330
Minutes9,32910,262

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
True shooting percentage45.1%55.3%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile46.2%55.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Field-goal percentage40.9%48.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable37.6%
Free-throw percentage72.9%80.3%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile30.8%Better result for this metric.19.7%
Assists per game4.44.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable14.8%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.5%Better result for this metric.4.2%
Rebounds per game3.1Better result for this metric.2.4

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.1%Better result for this metric.2.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.2%0.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Art Williams and Brian Taylor
MetricArt WilliamsBrian Taylor
Points per game5.312.3Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Art Williams ranks higher in career impact.

Art WilliamsMetricBrian Taylor
#251LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#787
+2.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0Leads
+1.4LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7
+688 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+662 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Art WilliamsMetricBrian Taylor
574LeadsListed-team regular-season wins219
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage44.5%Leads
7Leads50-win team seasons0
7Leads60-win team seasons0
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Art WilliamsMetricBrian Taylor
4Playoff appearancesNot available
39Playoff gamesNot available
26Team playoff winsNot available
1Finals appearancesNot available
1ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Art WilliamsMetricBrian Taylor
Not availableAll-Star0
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense1
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Art WilliamsBrian TaylorPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.