hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bailey Howell vs. Jerry Lucas: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jerry Lucas ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#69Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#59Leads
+3.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7
+2.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
8.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better7.0Leads
+2,648 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,152 ptsLeads
2Top-10 impact seasons4Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jerry Lucas #59 and Bailey Howell #69. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Bailey Howell had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bailey-howell/jerry-lucas/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBailey Howell10.407 · No. 69Jerry Lucas8.380 · No. 59

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bailey Howell

10.407 composite · No. 69 all-time

Bailey Howell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.33350%4.167
Best 5No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.40030%3.120
Best 10No. 61962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.60020%3.120

4.167 + 3.120 + 3.120= 10.407

Jerry Lucas

8.380 composite · No. 59 all-time

Jerry Lucas's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7.00050%3.500
Best 5No. 61968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.20030%2.460
Best 10No. 61968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.10020%2.420

3.500 + 2.460 + 2.420= 8.380

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bailey Howell and Jerry Lucas
MetricBailey HowellJerry Lucas
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#69#59Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.37.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.48.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better15.612.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bailey Howell and Jerry Lucas
MetricBailey HowellJerry Lucas
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#117#79Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8Better result for this metric.+3.7
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0+3.5Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5+3.1Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7+2.3Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,648 pts+3,152 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons24Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bailey Howell and Jerry Lucas
MetricBailey HowellJerry Lucas
Games950829
Minutes30,62732,131

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bailey Howell and Jerry Lucas
MetricBailey HowellJerry Lucas
True shooting percentage54.4%54.4%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.9%Better result for this metric.54.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bailey Howell and Jerry Lucas
MetricBailey HowellJerry Lucas
Field-goal percentage48.0%49.9%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage76.2%78.3%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bailey Howell and Jerry Lucas
MetricBailey HowellJerry Lucas
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.0%12.0%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.03.3Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bailey Howell and Jerry Lucas
MetricBailey HowellJerry Lucas
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable15.5%
Rebounds per game9.915.6Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bailey Howell and Jerry Lucas
MetricBailey HowellJerry Lucas
Points per game18.7Better result for this metric.17.0

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jerry Lucas ranks higher in career impact.

Bailey HowellMetricJerry Lucas
#69Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#59Leads
+3.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7
+2.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
+2,648 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,152 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bailey HowellMetricJerry Lucas
727Listed-team regular-season wins952Leads
0.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
750-win team seasons12Leads
760-win team seasons11Leads
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons8

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Bailey Howell leads every available measure below.

Bailey HowellMetricJerry Lucas
10LeadsPlayoff appearances8
86LeadsPlayoff games72
44LeadsTeam playoff wins35
2Finals appearances2
2LeadsChampionships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Jerry Lucas leads every available measure below.

Bailey HowellMetricJerry Lucas
6All-Star7Leads
0MVP0
1All-NBA5Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bailey HowellJerry LucasPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.