hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ben Gordon vs. Jim Barnett: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jim Barnett ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1013Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#365Leads
+2.1LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8
+0.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8
67.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better31.3Leads
+710 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+839 ptsLeads
174.4Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better79.6Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jim Barnett #365 and Ben Gordon #1013. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Ben Gordon had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/ben-gordon/jim-barnett/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBen Gordon95.800 · No. 1,013Jim Barnett44.187 · No. 365

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Ben Gordon

95.800 composite · No. 1,013 all-time

Ben Gordon's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 492006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 662007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 862008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate67.00050%33.500
Best 5No. 492006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 662007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 862008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1242005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1322004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate91.40030%27.420
Best 10No. 492006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 662007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 862008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1242005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1322004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2022009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2242011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2462012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2562010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3592014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate174.40020%34.880

33.500 + 27.420 + 34.880= 95.800

Jim Barnett

44.187 composite · No. 365 all-time

Jim Barnett's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 241970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate31.33350%15.667
Best 5No. 241970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate42.00030%12.600
Best 10No. 241970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1251974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 16979.60020%15.920

15.667 + 12.600 + 15.920= 44.187

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 169, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1013#365Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better67.031.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better91.442.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better174.479.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#617#532Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1Better result for this metric.+1.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Better result for this metric.+1.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9Better result for this metric.+0.8
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+710 pts+839 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Games744732
Minutes20,36617,410

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
True shooting percentage54.6%Better result for this metric.49.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.4%Better result for this metric.49.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Field-goal percentage43.2%43.5%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage40.1%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage85.7%Better result for this metric.79.7%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.1%17.3%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.53.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.6%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.2%5.5%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.53.1Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%1.3%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%Better result for this metric.0.3%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ben Gordon and Jim Barnett
MetricBen GordonJim Barnett
Points per game14.9Better result for this metric.11.7

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Barnett ranks higher in career impact.

Ben GordonMetricJim Barnett
#1013Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#365Leads
+2.1LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8
+0.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8
+710 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+839 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ben GordonMetricJim Barnett
382Listed-team regular-season wins951Leads
43.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
050-win team seasons12Leads
060-win team seasons11Leads
5Playoff team seasons6Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Jim Barnett leads every available measure below.

Ben GordonMetricJim Barnett
4Playoff appearances5Leads
29Playoff games30Leads
13Team playoff wins13
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ben GordonMetricJim Barnett
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Ben GordonJim BarnettPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.