hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bill Laimbeer vs. Walt Bellamy: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Walt Bellamy ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#348Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#101Leads
+2.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Leads
+1.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Leads
37.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.0Leads
+2,133 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,712 ptsLeads
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Walt Bellamy #101 and Bill Laimbeer #348. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bill-laimbeer/walt-bellamy/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBill Laimbeer42.367 · No. 348Walt Bellamy14.120 · No. 101

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bill Laimbeer

42.367 composite · No. 348 all-time

Bill Laimbeer's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 281983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate37.33350%18.667
Best 5No. 281983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate41.20030%12.360
Best 10No. 281983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 881992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate56.70020%11.340

18.667 + 12.360 + 11.340= 42.367

Walt Bellamy

14.120 composite · No. 101 all-time

Walt Bellamy's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 81961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.00050%5.000
Best 5No. 81961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.60030%3.780
Best 10No. 81961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 771970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate26.70020%5.340

5.000 + 3.780 + 5.340= 14.120

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#348#101Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better37.310.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better41.212.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better56.726.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#160#111Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2+2.8Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0+2.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8+1.9Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Better result for this metric.+1.2
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,133 pts+2,712 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Games1,0681,043
Minutes33,95638,940

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
True shooting percentage55.2%55.4%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile55.5%55.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Field-goal percentage49.8%51.6%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage32.6%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage83.7%Better result for this metric.63.2%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.7%9.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.02.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.7%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.0%Better result for this metric.16.3%
Rebounds per game9.713.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.0%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bill Laimbeer and Walt Bellamy
MetricBill LaimbeerWalt Bellamy
Points per game12.920.1Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Walt Bellamy ranks higher in career impact.

Bill LaimbeerMetricWalt Bellamy
#348Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#101Leads
+2.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Leads
+1.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Leads
+2,133 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,712 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bill LaimbeerMetricWalt Bellamy
646Listed-team regular-season wins1,215Leads
52.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
550-win team seasons14Leads
160-win team seasons14Leads
9Playoff team seasons9

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Bill Laimbeer leads every available measure below.

Bill LaimbeerMetricWalt Bellamy
9LeadsPlayoff appearances7
113LeadsPlayoff games46
71LeadsTeam playoff wins17
3LeadsFinals appearances0
2LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Walt Bellamy leads every available measure below.

Bill LaimbeerMetricWalt Bellamy
4All-Star4
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bill LaimbeerWalt BellamyPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.