Bill Sharman
1950–51 to 1960–61 · 11 seasons
NBA player comparison
Bill Sharman vs. Larry Foust: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Bill Sharman ranks higher in career impact
Larry Foust
1950–51 to 1961–62 · 12 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#80LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#99
+2.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2
+1.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7
10.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.0Leads
+1,816 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,267 pts
2LeadsTop-10 impact seasons1
Career Impact Rank places Bill Sharman #80 and Larry Foust #99. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBill Sharman12.093 · No. 80Larry Foust14.060 · No. 99
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Bill Sharman
12.093 composite · No. 80 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 101952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 10.667 | 50% | 5.333 |
| Best 5No. 101952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 12.000 | 30% | 3.600 |
| Best 10No. 101952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 15.800 | 20% | 3.160 |
5.333 + 3.600 + 3.160= 12.093
Larry Foust
14.060 composite · No. 99 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 61954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 10.000 | 50% | 5.000 |
| Best 5No. 61954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 13.200 | 30% | 3.960 |
| Best 10No. 61954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 25.500 | 20% | 5.100 |
5.000 + 3.960 + 5.100= 14.060
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Bill Sharman | Larry Foust |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #80Better result for this metric. | #99 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 10.7 | 10.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 12.0Better result for this metric. | 13.2 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 15.8Better result for this metric. | 25.5 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Bill Sharman | Larry Foust |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #212Better result for this metric. | #351 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.3Better result for this metric. | +2.2 |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.1Better result for this metric. | +2.0 |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.9Better result for this metric. | +1.7 |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.4Better result for this metric. | +0.6 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +1,816 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +1,267 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 2Better result for this metric. | 1 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Bill Sharman | Larry Foust |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 711 | 817 |
| Minutes | 22,614 | 24,200 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Bill Sharman | Larry Foust |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 49.7%Better result for this metric. | 48.5% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 49.5% | 51.2%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Bill Sharman | Larry Foust |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 42.6%Better result for this metric. | 40.5% |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 88.3%Better result for this metric. | 74.1% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Bill Sharman | Larry Foust |
|---|---|---|
| Assists per game | 3.0Better result for this metric. | 1.7 |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Bill Sharman | Larry Foust |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 3.9 | 9.8Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Bill Sharman | Larry Foust |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 17.8Better result for this metric. | 13.7 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Bill Sharman ranks higher in career impact.
Bill SharmanMetricLarry Foust
#80LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#99
+2.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2
+1.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7
+1,816 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,267 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Bill Sharman leads every available measure below.
Bill SharmanMetricLarry Foust
473LeadsListed-team regular-season wins454
62.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage48.1%
3Leads50-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons0
10Playoff team seasons10
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Bill Sharman leads every available measure below.
Bill SharmanMetricLarry Foust
10Playoff appearances10
78LeadsPlayoff games73
45LeadsTeam playoff wins33
5Finals appearances5
4LeadsChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
Bill Sharman leads every available measure below.
Bill SharmanMetricLarry Foust
8All-Star8
0MVP0
7LeadsAll-NBA2
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Bill SharmanLarry FoustPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Bill SharmanNBA seasonLarry Foust
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.