hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bill Tosheff vs. Ken Murray: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Ken Murray ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#640Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#510Leads
-0.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Leads
-1.1Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9Leads
#49Best league finish#17Leads
+117 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+175 ptsLeads
203LeadsGames181

Career Impact Rank places Ken Murray #510 and Bill Tosheff #640. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/bill-tosheff/ken-murray/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBill Tosheff67.140 · No. 640Ken Murray57.360 · No. 510

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bill Tosheff

67.140 composite · No. 640 all-time

Bill Tosheff's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 491952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate57.00050%28.500
Best 5No. 491952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 9672.60030%21.780
Best 10No. 491952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7 open slots × No. 9684.30020%16.860

28.500 + 21.780 + 16.860= 67.140

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 96, this player's stored replacement finish.

Ken Murray

57.360 composite · No. 510 all-time

Ken Murray's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 171950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 511954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.00050%24.000
Best 5No. 171950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 511954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 8462.40030%18.720
Best 10No. 171950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 511954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7 open slots × No. 8473.20020%14.640

24.000 + 18.720 + 14.640= 57.360

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 84, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bill Tosheff and Ken Murray
MetricBill TosheffKen Murray
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#640#510Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better57.048.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better72.662.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better84.373.2Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bill Tosheff and Ken Murray
MetricBill TosheffKen Murray
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1379#1241Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4+1.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1-0.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+117 pts+175 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bill Tosheff and Ken Murray
MetricBill TosheffKen Murray
Games203181
Minutes6,3394,138

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bill Tosheff and Ken Murray
MetricBill TosheffKen Murray
True shooting percentage39.7%39.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bill Tosheff and Ken Murray
MetricBill TosheffKen Murray
Field-goal percentage31.5%33.5%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage79.3%Better result for this metric.74.7%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bill Tosheff and Ken Murray
MetricBill TosheffKen Murray
Assists per game3.3Better result for this metric.2.7

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bill Tosheff and Ken Murray
MetricBill TosheffKen Murray
Rebounds per game3.03.3Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bill Tosheff and Ken Murray
MetricBill TosheffKen Murray
Points per game9.2Better result for this metric.8.1

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Ken Murray ranks higher in career impact.

Bill TosheffMetricKen Murray
#640Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#510Leads
-0.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Leads
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+117 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+175 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bill TosheffMetricKen Murray
83Listed-team regular-season wins129Leads
39.7%Listed-team winning percentage46.4%Leads
050-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
2LeadsPlayoff team seasons1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Ken Murray leads every available measure below.

Bill TosheffMetricKen Murray
2Playoff appearances2
4Playoff games6Leads
0Team playoff wins1Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bill TosheffMetricKen Murray
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
1Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bill TosheffKen MurrayPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.