hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bimbo Coles vs. Scott Williams: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Bimbo Coles ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1539LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1710
+0.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5
-0.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3
140.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better157.7
+19 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-90 pts
196.5LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better220.8

Career Impact Rank places Bimbo Coles #1539 and Scott Williams #1710. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bimbo-coles/scott-williams/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBimbo Coles157.153 · No. 1,539Scott Williams176.753 · No. 1,710

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bimbo Coles

157.153 composite · No. 1,539 all-time

Bimbo Coles's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1121998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1741991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate140.66750%70.333
Best 5No. 1121998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1741991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1831995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1871993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate158.40030%47.520
Best 10No. 1121998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1741991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1831995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1871993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2061990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2081994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2411999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2431997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2751996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate196.50020%39.300

70.333 + 47.520 + 39.300= 157.153

Scott Williams

176.753 composite · No. 1,710 all-time

Scott Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1981993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate157.66750%78.833
Best 5No. 1341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1981993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate179.20030%53.760
Best 10No. 1341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1981993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2271996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2491999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2612003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2751997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3002001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate220.80020%44.160

78.833 + 53.760 + 44.160= 176.753

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1539Better result for this metric.#1710
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better140.7Better result for this metric.157.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better158.4Better result for this metric.179.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better196.5Better result for this metric.220.8
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1837Better result for this metric.#4464
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4Better result for this metric.-0.5
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4Better result for this metric.-0.9
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8Better result for this metric.-1.3
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.6Better result for this metric.-2.1
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+19 ptsBetter result for this metric.-90 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Games852746
Minutes20,31912,220

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
True shooting percentage49.6%50.4%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile49.6%50.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Field-goal percentage42.5%46.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage26.7%Better result for this metric.11.1%
Free-throw percentage81.1%Better result for this metric.72.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile25.7%Better result for this metric.5.6%
Assists per game3.9Better result for this metric.0.6
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.9%12.4%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.2%16.8%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.14.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.9%Better result for this metric.1.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.5%2.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bimbo Coles and Scott Williams
MetricBimbo ColesScott Williams
Points per game7.8Better result for this metric.5.1

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Bimbo Coles ranks higher in career impact.

Bimbo ColesMetricScott Williams
#1539LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1710
+0.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5
-0.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3
+19 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-90 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Scott Williams leads every available measure below.

Bimbo ColesMetricScott Williams
510Listed-team regular-season wins679Leads
39.8%Listed-team winning percentage51.1%Leads
050-win team seasons6Leads
060-win team seasons2Leads
5Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Scott Williams leads every available measure below.

Bimbo ColesMetricScott Williams
3Playoff appearances8Leads
11Playoff games94Leads
6Team playoff wins66Leads
0Finals appearances3Leads
0Championships3Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bimbo ColesMetricScott Williams
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bimbo ColesScott WilliamsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.