hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Blair Rasmussen vs. Robert Sacre: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Blair Rasmussen ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1667LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2918
-0.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.7
-2.0LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.7
#124LeadsBest league finish#298
-64 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-85 pts
532LeadsGames189

Career Impact Rank places Blair Rasmussen #1667 and Robert Sacre #2918. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/blair-rasmussen/robert-sacre/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBlair Rasmussen171.400 · No. 1,667Robert Sacre335.573 · No. 2,918

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Blair Rasmussen

171.400 composite · No. 1,667 all-time

Blair Rasmussen's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1241989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1671986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate146.00050%73.000
Best 5No. 1241989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1671986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2251990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2321988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate179.00030%53.700
Best 10No. 1241989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1671986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2251990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2321988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2321991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 277223.50020%44.700

73.000 + 53.700 + 44.700= 171.400

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 277, this player's stored replacement finish.

Robert Sacre

335.573 composite · No. 2,918 all-time

Robert Sacre's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 2982013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 359.5327.16750%163.583
Best 5No. 2982013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 359.5340.10030%102.030
Best 10No. 2982013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8 open slots × No. 359.5349.80020%69.960

163.583 + 102.030 + 69.960= 335.573

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 359.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1667Better result for this metric.#2918
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better146.0Better result for this metric.327.2
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better179.0Better result for this metric.340.1
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better223.5Better result for this metric.349.8
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4308Better result for this metric.#4435
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Better result for this metric.-2.7
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1Unavailable
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7Unavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-64 ptsBetter result for this metric.-85 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Games532189
Minutes11,4092,745

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
True shooting percentage50.0%Better result for this metric.47.5%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.2%Better result for this metric.48.1%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Field-goal percentage47.2%Better result for this metric.43.6%
Three-point percentage25.7%Better result for this metric.0.0%
Free-throw percentage76.7%Better result for this metric.67.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.6%7.2%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game0.9Better result for this metric.0.7
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.8%Better result for this metric.10.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.6%Better result for this metric.11.9%
Rebounds per game5.7Better result for this metric.3.1

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.8%1.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.4%3.1%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Blair Rasmussen and Robert Sacre
MetricBlair RasmussenRobert Sacre
Points per game9.6Better result for this metric.4.2

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Blair Rasmussen ranks higher in career impact.

Blair RasmussenMetricRobert Sacre
#1667LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2918
-0.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.7
-1.7Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
-64 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-85 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Blair Rasmussen leads every available measure below.

Blair RasmussenMetricRobert Sacre
326LeadsListed-team regular-season wins110
49.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage33.5%
1Leads50-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Blair Rasmussen leads every available measure below.

Blair RasmussenMetricRobert Sacre
5LeadsPlayoff appearances1
29LeadsPlayoff games2
10LeadsTeam playoff wins0
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Blair RasmussenMetricRobert Sacre
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Blair RasmussenRobert SacrePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.