hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bob Duffy vs. Paul Hogue: 1962–63 season

hussEyquation1962–63 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader

Impact comparison

Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.

—Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-4.6
—Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#92
42Games50
435Minutes1,340
3.7PPG7.7Leads
40.3%LeadsTS%38.6%

Season impact is unavailable for at least one player in this scope. hussEyquation does not substitute a different measure or declare a winner.

Bob Duffy: 42 games and 435 minutes. Paul Hogue: 50 games and 1,340 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

1962–63 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/bob-duffy/paul-hogue/1962-63

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · 1962–63 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Bob Duffy and Paul Hogue
MetricBob DuffyPaul Hogue
Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-4.6
Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is bestUnavailable#92

Bob Duffy: verified lineup window unavailable. Paul Hogue: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bob Duffy and Paul Hogue
MetricBob DuffyPaul Hogue
Games4250
Minutes4351,340

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bob Duffy and Paul Hogue
MetricBob DuffyPaul Hogue
True shooting percentage40.3%Better result for this metric.38.6%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bob Duffy and Paul Hogue
MetricBob DuffyPaul Hogue
Field-goal percentage37.9%Better result for this metric.36.3%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage56.4%Better result for this metric.45.4%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bob Duffy and Paul Hogue
MetricBob DuffyPaul Hogue
Assists per game2.0Better result for this metric.0.8

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bob Duffy and Paul Hogue
MetricBob DuffyPaul Hogue
Rebounds per game0.98.6Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bob Duffy and Paul Hogue
MetricBob DuffyPaul Hogue
Points per game3.77.7Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader.

Bob DuffyMetricPaul Hogue
Not availableImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-4.6
Not availableImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#92

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bob DuffyMetricPaul Hogue
219LeadsListed-team regular-season wins74
1.1%Listed-team winning percentage30.8%Leads
1Leads50-win team seasons0
1Leads60-win team seasons0
2LeadsPlayoff team seasons0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bob DuffyMetricPaul Hogue
1Playoff appearancesNot available
5Playoff gamesNot available
6Team playoff winsNot available
0Finals appearancesNot available
0ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bob DuffyMetricPaul Hogue
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Selected seasons

Box impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Bob DuffyPaul Hogue

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.