hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bob Love vs. Greg Smith: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Bob Love ranks higher in career impact

Bob Love

1966–67 to 1976–77 · 11 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#627LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#634
+0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3
-0.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1Leads
55.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.7Leads
+523 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+494 pts
93.8LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better113.9

Career Impact Rank places Bob Love #627 and Greg Smith #634. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bob-love/greg-smith-smithgr01/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBob Love66.300 · No. 627Greg Smith66.713 · No. 634

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bob Love

66.300 composite · No. 627 all-time

Bob Love's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 371969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate55.00050%27.500
Best 5No. 371969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate66.80030%20.040
Best 10No. 371969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1081968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1141967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1371973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate93.80020%18.760

27.500 + 20.040 + 18.760= 66.300

Greg Smith

66.713 composite · No. 634 all-time

Greg Smith's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 451968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.66750%25.333
Best 5No. 451968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate62.00030%18.600
Best 10No. 451968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1511973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 169113.90020%22.780

25.333 + 18.600 + 22.780= 66.713

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 169, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#627Better result for this metric.#634
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better55.050.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better66.862.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better93.8Better result for this metric.113.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#757Better result for this metric.#777
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Better result for this metric.+0.3
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1+0.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3-0.1Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.4Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+523 ptsBetter result for this metric.+494 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Games789524
Minutes25,12012,269

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
True shooting percentage48.5%50.8%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.0%50.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Field-goal percentage42.9%48.2%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage80.5%Better result for this metric.64.6%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.8%9.7%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.41.8Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.6%10.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game5.96.2Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.2%2.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%0.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bob Love and Greg Smith
MetricBob LoveGreg Smith
Points per game17.6Better result for this metric.7.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Bob Love ranks higher in career impact.

Bob LoveMetricGreg Smith
#627LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#634
+0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3
-0.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1Leads
+523 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+494 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Bob Love leads every available measure below.

Bob LoveMetricGreg Smith
1,007LeadsListed-team regular-season wins820
0.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
11Leads50-win team seasons10
11Leads60-win team seasons10
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons3

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bob LoveMetricGreg Smith
6LeadsPlayoff appearances2
47LeadsPlayoff games24
18LeadsTeam playoff wins17
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bob LoveMetricGreg Smith
3All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
2All-NBANot available
3All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bob LoveGreg SmithPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.