hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bob McAdoo vs. Fred Brown: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Fred Brown ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#140Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#98Leads
+4.9LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8
+3.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3
6.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better9.3
+2,439 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,223 pts
3LeadsTop-10 impact seasons2

Career Impact Rank places Fred Brown #98 and Bob McAdoo #140. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Bob McAdoo had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bob-mcadoo/fred-brown/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBob McAdoo18.327 · No. 140Fred Brown13.967 · No. 98

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bob McAdoo

18.327 composite · No. 140 all-time

Bob McAdoo's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 41973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6.33350%3.167
Best 5No. 41973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.00030%3.300
Best 10No. 41973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1141979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1161982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2081981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate59.30020%11.860

3.167 + 3.300 + 11.860= 18.327

Fred Brown

13.967 composite · No. 98 all-time

Fred Brown's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 81975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9.33350%4.667
Best 5No. 81975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate13.00030%3.900
Best 10No. 81975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.00020%5.400

4.667 + 3.900 + 5.400= 13.967

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#140#98Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better6.3Better result for this metric.9.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better11.0Better result for this metric.13.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better59.327.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#135Better result for this metric.#149
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.9Better result for this metric.+3.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.4Better result for this metric.+3.8
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8Better result for this metric.+3.3
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7+2.5Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,439 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,223 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons2Better result for this metric.0
Top-ten impact seasons3Better result for this metric.2

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Games852963
Minutes28,32724,422

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
True shooting percentage55.1%Better result for this metric.51.8%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.8%Better result for this metric.52.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Field-goal percentage50.3%Better result for this metric.47.8%
Three-point percentage8.1%37.3%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage75.4%85.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.2%19.8%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.33.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.6%12.5%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.5%Better result for this metric.5.2%
Rebounds per game9.4Better result for this metric.2.7

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.4%2.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%Better result for this metric.0.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bob McAdoo and Fred Brown
MetricBob McAdooFred Brown
Points per game22.1Better result for this metric.14.6

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Fred Brown ranks higher in career impact.

Bob McAdooMetricFred Brown
#140Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#98Leads
+4.9LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8
+3.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3
+2,439 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,223 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Bob McAdoo leads every available measure below.

Bob McAdooMetricFred Brown
847LeadsListed-team regular-season wins781
1.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.8%
9Leads50-win team seasons8
560-win team seasons5
9LeadsPlayoff team seasons8

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Bob McAdoo leads every available measure below.

Bob McAdooMetricFred Brown
9LeadsPlayoff appearances8
94LeadsPlayoff games83
66LeadsTeam playoff wins43
4LeadsFinals appearances2
2LeadsChampionships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Bob McAdoo leads every available measure below.

Bob McAdooMetricFred Brown
5LeadsAll-Star1
1LeadsMVP0
2LeadsAll-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bob McAdooFred BrownPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.