hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bob Rule vs. Jim Davis: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jim Davis ranks higher in career impact

Bob Rule

1967–68 to 1974–75 · 8 seasons

Jim Davis

1967–68 to 1974–75 · 8 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#723Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#616Leads
+0.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Leads
-0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.0Leads
+438 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+347 pts
118.8Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better106.3Leads
50.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.3

Career Impact Rank places Jim Davis #616 and Bob Rule #723. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Bob Rule had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bob-rule/jim-davis/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBob Rule73.587 · No. 723Jim Davis65.327 · No. 616

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bob Rule

73.587 composite · No. 723 all-time

Bob Rule's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 371968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.33350%25.167
Best 5No. 371968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1111971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1491972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate82.20030%24.660
Best 10No. 371968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1111971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1491972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1591973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 154.5118.80020%23.760

25.167 + 24.660 + 23.760= 73.587

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 154.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Jim Davis

65.327 composite · No. 616 all-time

Jim Davis's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 421969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.33350%25.167
Best 5No. 421969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 941970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate63.00030%18.900
Best 10No. 421969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 941970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1061973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 169106.30020%21.260

25.167 + 18.900 + 21.260= 65.327

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 169, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#723#616Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.350.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better82.263.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better118.8106.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#845Better result for this metric.#950
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6+0.8Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1+0.4Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8+0.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+438 ptsBetter result for this metric.+347 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Games403597
Minutes11,86210,027

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
True shooting percentage50.3%51.0%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile47.9%51.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Field-goal percentage46.1%46.1%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage68.6%Better result for this metric.67.4%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.5%9.9%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.5Better result for this metric.1.2

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.8%14.7%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game8.3Better result for this metric.5.2

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.0%2.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.0%1.8%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bob Rule and Jim Davis
MetricBob RuleJim Davis
Points per game17.4Better result for this metric.6.7

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Davis ranks higher in career impact.

Bob RuleMetricJim Davis
#723Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#616Leads
+0.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Leads
-0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.0Leads
+438 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+347 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Jim Davis leads every available measure below.

Bob RuleMetricJim Davis
820Listed-team regular-season wins820
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage0.4%
1050-win team seasons10
1060-win team seasons10
0Playoff team seasons7Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bob RuleMetricJim Davis
Not availablePlayoff appearances6
Not availablePlayoff games33
Not availableTeam playoff wins16
Not availableFinals appearances0
Not availableChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Bob RuleMetricJim Davis
1All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bob RuleJim DavisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.