hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bobby Wanzer vs. Connie Hawkins: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Bobby Wanzer ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#115LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#174
+3.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.4Leads
+2.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Leads
8.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better9.0
+1,101 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,826 ptsLeads
43.7LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better71.1

Career Impact Rank places Bobby Wanzer #115 and Connie Hawkins #174. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Connie Hawkins had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/bobby-wanzer/connie-hawkins/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBobby Wanzer15.980 · No. 115Connie Hawkins22.500 · No. 174

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bobby Wanzer

15.980 composite · No. 115 all-time

Bobby Wanzer's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 51951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.00050%4.000
Best 5No. 51951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 151952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.80030%3.240
Best 10No. 51951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 151952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 9043.70020%8.740

4.000 + 3.240 + 8.740= 15.980

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 90, this player's stored replacement finish.

Connie Hawkins

22.500 composite · No. 174 all-time

Connie Hawkins's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9.00050%4.500
Best 5No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.60030%3.780
Best 10No. 71970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 17471.10020%14.220

4.500 + 3.780 + 14.220= 22.500

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 174, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#115Better result for this metric.#174
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.0Better result for this metric.9.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.8Better result for this metric.12.6
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better43.7Better result for this metric.71.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#417#210Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3+3.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7+3.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2+2.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,101 pts+1,826 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons2Better result for this metric.0
Top-ten impact seasons22

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Games441499
Minutes13,92017,234

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
True shooting percentage48.7%53.5%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable52.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Field-goal percentage39.2%46.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage80.0%Better result for this metric.78.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable16.5%
Assists per game3.24.1Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable10.6%
Rebounds per game4.58.0Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.0%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.3%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bobby Wanzer and Connie Hawkins
MetricBobby WanzerConnie Hawkins
Points per game12.516.5Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Bobby Wanzer ranks higher in career impact.

Bobby WanzerMetricConnie Hawkins
#115LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#174
+3.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.4Leads
+2.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Leads
+1,101 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,826 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bobby WanzerMetricConnie Hawkins
261Listed-team regular-season wins656Leads
53.0%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
050-win team seasons8Leads
060-win team seasons8Leads
5LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Bobby Wanzer leads every available measure below.

Bobby WanzerMetricConnie Hawkins
5LeadsPlayoff appearances2
32LeadsPlayoff games12
15LeadsTeam playoff wins4
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Bobby Wanzer leads every available measure below.

Bobby WanzerMetricConnie Hawkins
5LeadsAll-Star4
0MVP0
3LeadsAll-NBA1
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bobby WanzerConnie HawkinsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.