hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Bradley Beal vs. Fred Brown: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Fred Brown ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#279Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#98Leads
+4.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8
+3.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3Leads
22.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better9.3Leads
+2,007 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,223 ptsLeads
0Top-10 impact seasons2Leads

Career Impact Rank places Fred Brown #98 and Bradley Beal #279. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Bradley Beal had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/bradley-beal/fred-brown/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBradley Beal35.680 · No. 279Fred Brown13.967 · No. 98

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Bradley Beal

35.680 composite · No. 279 all-time

Bradley Beal's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 162019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272020–2122.00050%11.000
Best 5No. 162019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272020–21No. 422016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 552022–2332.60030%9.780
Best 10No. 162019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272020–21No. 422016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 552022–23No. 582017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 922012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1262015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1512014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1552013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate74.50020%14.900

11.000 + 9.780 + 14.900= 35.680

Fred Brown

13.967 composite · No. 98 all-time

Fred Brown's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 81975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9.33350%4.667
Best 5No. 81975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate13.00030%3.900
Best 10No. 81975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.00020%5.400

4.667 + 3.900 + 5.400= 13.967

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#279#98Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better22.09.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better32.613.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better74.527.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#177#149Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.3Better result for this metric.+3.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8+3.8
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2+3.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9+2.5Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,007 pts+2,223 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons02Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Games807963
Minutes27,68124,422

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
True shooting percentage56.8%Better result for this metric.51.8%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile57.2%Better result for this metric.52.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Field-goal percentage46.4%47.8%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage37.6%Better result for this metric.37.3%
Free-throw percentage82.1%85.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile22.1%Better result for this metric.19.8%
Assists per game4.3Better result for this metric.3.3
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.7%Better result for this metric.12.5%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.7%Better result for this metric.5.2%
Rebounds per game4.0Better result for this metric.2.7

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.5%2.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%Better result for this metric.0.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Bradley Beal and Fred Brown
MetricBradley BealFred Brown
Points per game21.4Better result for this metric.14.6

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Fred Brown ranks higher in career impact so far.

Bradley BealMetricFred Brown
#279Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#98Leads
+4.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8
+3.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3Leads
+2,007 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,223 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Bradley BealMetricFred Brown
540Listed-team regular-season wins781Leads
47.9%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.8%
050-win team seasons8Leads
060-win team seasons5Leads
6Playoff team seasons8Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Fred Brown leads every available measure below.

Bradley BealMetricFred Brown
6Playoff appearances8Leads
49Playoff games83Leads
22Team playoff wins43Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Bradley Beal leads every available measure below.

Bradley BealMetricFred Brown
3LeadsAll-Star1
0MVP0
1LeadsAll-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Bradley BealFred BrownPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.