hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Buck Williams vs. Byron Scott: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Byron Scott ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#531Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#501Leads
+2.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0Leads
+1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Leads
48.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better47.7Leads
+1,899 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,578 pts
83.0Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better76.4Leads

Career Impact Rank places Byron Scott #501 and Buck Williams #531. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Buck Williams had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/buck-williams/byron-scott/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBuck Williams58.813 · No. 531Byron Scott56.633 · No. 501

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Buck Williams

58.813 composite · No. 531 all-time

Buck Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 341982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.66750%24.333
Best 5No. 341982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate59.60030%17.880
Best 10No. 341982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 881983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1211985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate83.00020%16.600

24.333 + 17.880 + 16.600= 58.813

Byron Scott

56.633 composite · No. 501 all-time

Byron Scott's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 201987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate47.66750%23.833
Best 5No. 201987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate58.40030%17.520
Best 10No. 201987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 771993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 941984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 951994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1021989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1041995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate76.40020%15.280

23.833 + 17.520 + 15.280= 56.633

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#531#501Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.747.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better59.658.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better83.076.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#200Better result for this metric.#257
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1+3.0Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4+2.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.5Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6+1.0Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,899 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,578 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Games1,3071,073
Minutes42,46430,152

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
True shooting percentage58.7%Better result for this metric.55.6%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile60.4%Better result for this metric.56.3%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Field-goal percentage54.9%Better result for this metric.48.2%
Three-point percentage16.7%37.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage66.4%83.3%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.7%13.9%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.32.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.4%11.2%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.8%Better result for this metric.5.7%
Rebounds per game10.0Better result for this metric.2.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.2%2.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.5%Better result for this metric.0.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Buck Williams and Byron Scott
MetricBuck WilliamsByron Scott
Points per game12.814.1Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Byron Scott ranks higher in career impact.

Buck WilliamsMetricByron Scott
#531Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#501Leads
+2.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0Leads
+1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Leads
+1,899 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,578 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Buck WilliamsMetricByron Scott
753LeadsListed-team regular-season wins735
54.0%Listed-team winning percentage64.0%Leads
550-win team seasons10Leads
160-win team seasons5Leads
14LeadsPlayoff team seasons13

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Buck WilliamsMetricByron Scott
14LeadsPlayoff appearances13
108Playoff games183Leads
53Team playoff wins121Leads
2Finals appearances6Leads
0Championships3Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Buck WilliamsMetricByron Scott
3All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
1All-NBANot available
4All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
1Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Buck WilliamsByron ScottPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.