hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Cazzie Russell vs. Clarence Weatherspoon: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Cazzie Russell ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#393LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#976
+1.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Leads
+0.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7Leads
38.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better78.3
+918 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+968 ptsLeads
66.4LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better123.3

Career Impact Rank places Cazzie Russell #393 and Clarence Weatherspoon #976. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Clarence Weatherspoon had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/cazzie-russell/clarence-weatherspoon/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCazzie Russell46.967 · No. 393Clarence Weatherspoon92.147 · No. 976

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Cazzie Russell

46.967 composite · No. 393 all-time

Cazzie Russell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate38.33350%19.167
Best 5No. 331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.40030%14.520
Best 10No. 331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate66.40020%13.280

19.167 + 14.520 + 13.280= 46.967

Clarence Weatherspoon

92.147 composite · No. 976 all-time

Clarence Weatherspoon's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 642000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate78.33350%39.167
Best 5No. 642000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate94.40030%28.320
Best 10No. 642000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1492003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1501994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1581996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate123.30020%24.660

39.167 + 28.320 + 24.660= 92.147

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#393Better result for this metric.#976
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better38.3Better result for this metric.78.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.4Better result for this metric.94.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better66.4Better result for this metric.123.3
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#493#470Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0+1.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7+1.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4+0.7Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1+0.0Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+918 pts+968 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Games817915
Minutes22,21327,736

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
True shooting percentage50.6%52.6%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.6%53.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Field-goal percentage46.4%47.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable19.6%
Free-throw percentage82.7%Better result for this metric.74.3%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.0%Better result for this metric.7.9%
Assists per game2.2Better result for this metric.1.5
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable13.2%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.3%14.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.87.5Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%1.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%2.0%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Cazzie Russell and Clarence Weatherspoon
MetricCazzie RussellClarence Weatherspoon
Points per game15.1Better result for this metric.11.5

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Cazzie Russell ranks higher in career impact.

Cazzie RussellMetricClarence Weatherspoon
#393LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#976
+1.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Leads
+0.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7Leads
+918 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+968 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Cazzie RussellMetricClarence Weatherspoon
912LeadsListed-team regular-season wins482
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage40.2%Leads
11Leads50-win team seasons2
10Leads60-win team seasons0
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Cazzie Russell leads every available measure below.

Cazzie RussellMetricClarence Weatherspoon
8LeadsPlayoff appearances4
72LeadsPlayoff games18
38LeadsTeam playoff wins12
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Cazzie RussellMetricClarence Weatherspoon
1All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Cazzie RussellClarence WeatherspoonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.