hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Cazzie Russell vs. Dave Bing: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Dave Bing ranks higher in career impact

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Dave Bing

Dave Bing

1966–67 to 1977–78 · 12 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#393Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#290Leads
+1.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5Leads
+0.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Leads
38.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better24.3Leads
+918 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,461 ptsLeads
66.4Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better63.8Leads

Career Impact Rank places Dave Bing #290 and Cazzie Russell #393. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/cazzie-russell/dave-bing/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCazzie Russell46.967 · No. 393Dave Bing36.747 · No. 290

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Cazzie Russell

46.967 composite · No. 393 all-time

Cazzie Russell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate38.33350%19.167
Best 5No. 331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.40030%14.520
Best 10No. 331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate66.40020%13.280

19.167 + 14.520 + 13.280= 46.967

Dave Bing

36.747 composite · No. 290 all-time

Dave Bing's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 141970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.33350%12.167
Best 5No. 141970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.40030%11.820
Best 10No. 141970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 791975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1291976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate63.80020%12.760

12.167 + 11.820 + 12.760= 36.747

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#393#290Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better38.324.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.439.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better66.463.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#493#296Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0+2.5Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7+1.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4+0.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1+0.2Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+918 pts+1,461 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Games817901
Minutes22,21332,769

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
True shooting percentage50.6%Better result for this metric.50.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.6%Better result for this metric.50.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Field-goal percentage46.4%Better result for this metric.44.1%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage82.7%Better result for this metric.77.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.0%24.7%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.26.0Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.3%Better result for this metric.4.8%
Rebounds per game3.83.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%1.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%0.3%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Cazzie Russell and Dave Bing
MetricCazzie RussellDave Bing
Points per game15.120.3Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Dave Bing ranks higher in career impact.

Cazzie RussellMetricDave Bing
#393Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#290Leads
+1.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5Leads
+0.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Leads
+918 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,461 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Cazzie Russell leads every available measure below.

Cazzie RussellMetricDave Bing
912LeadsListed-team regular-season wins899
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage0.5%
11Leads50-win team seasons10
1060-win team seasons10
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Cazzie Russell leads every available measure below.

Cazzie RussellMetricDave Bing
8LeadsPlayoff appearances5
72LeadsPlayoff games31
38LeadsTeam playoff wins13
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Dave Bing leads every available measure below.

Cazzie RussellMetricDave Bing
1All-Star7Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA3Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Cazzie RussellDave BingPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.