hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Charlie Ward vs. Michael Redd: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Michael Redd ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#491Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#307Leads
+3.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.9Leads
+2.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
42.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better26.0Leads
+887 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,557 ptsLeads
99.8Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better84.3Leads

Career Impact Rank places Michael Redd #307 and Charlie Ward #491. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/charlie-ward/michael-redd/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCharlie Ward56.053 · No. 491Michael Redd38.800 · No. 307

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Charlie Ward

56.053 composite · No. 491 all-time

Charlie Ward's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 211997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate42.66750%21.333
Best 5No. 211997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 582001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate49.20030%14.760
Best 10No. 211997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 582001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 732000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 791998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1501996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 32299.80020%19.960

21.333 + 14.760 + 19.960= 56.053

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 322, this player's stored replacement finish.

Michael Redd

38.800 composite · No. 307 all-time

Michael Redd's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 212002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate26.00050%13.000
Best 5No. 212002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 342001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 372008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate29.80030%8.940
Best 10No. 212002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 342001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 372008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 632003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1832009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2882011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate84.30020%16.860

13.000 + 8.940 + 16.860= 38.800

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#491#307Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better42.726.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better49.229.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better99.884.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#513#263Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.5+3.9Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5+3.6Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2+3.1Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable+1.6
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+887 pts+1,557 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Games630629
Minutes14,08020,104

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
True shooting percentage53.1%55.8%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.0%54.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Field-goal percentage40.8%44.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage36.4%38.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage77.1%83.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile29.5%Better result for this metric.11.8%
Assists per game4.0Better result for this metric.2.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile21.9%8.0%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.0%Better result for this metric.6.9%
Rebounds per game2.63.8Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.0%Better result for this metric.1.5%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%Better result for this metric.0.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Charlie Ward and Michael Redd
MetricCharlie WardMichael Redd
Points per game6.319.0Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Michael Redd ranks higher in career impact.

Charlie WardMetricMichael Redd
#491Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#307Leads
+3.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.9Leads
+2.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
+887 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,557 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Charlie Ward leads every available measure below.

Charlie WardMetricMichael Redd
541LeadsListed-team regular-season wins448
56.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage46.3%
5Leads50-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons0
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Charlie Ward leads every available measure below.

Charlie WardMetricMichael Redd
7LeadsPlayoff appearances3
72LeadsPlayoff games16
43LeadsTeam playoff wins4
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Charlie WardMetricMichael Redd
Not availableAll-Star1
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA1
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Charlie WardMichael ReddPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.