hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Chick Halbert vs. Jim Pollard: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Jim Pollard ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#885Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#163Leads
+1.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4Leads
+1.5Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Leads
#20Best league finish#9Leads
+123 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+837 ptsLeads
68Games319Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jim Pollard #163 and Chick Halbert #885. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/chick-halbert/jim-pollard/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedChick Halbert84.787 · No. 885Jim Pollard21.020 · No. 163

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Chick Halbert

84.787 composite · No. 885 all-time

Chick Halbert's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 201950–51Reconstructed historical estimate2 open slots × No. 10677.33350%38.667
Best 5No. 201950–51Reconstructed historical estimate4 open slots × No. 10688.80030%26.640
Best 10No. 201950–51Reconstructed historical estimate9 open slots × No. 10697.40020%19.480

38.667 + 26.640 + 19.480= 84.787

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 106, this player's stored replacement finish.

Jim Pollard

21.020 composite · No. 163 all-time

Jim Pollard's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 91951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141950–51Reconstructed historical estimate11.00050%5.500
Best 5No. 91951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 171952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.80030%4.440
Best 10No. 91951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 171952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 9655.40020%11.080

5.500 + 4.440 + 11.080= 21.020

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 96, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Chick Halbert and Jim Pollard
MetricChick HalbertJim Pollard
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#885#163Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better77.311.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better88.814.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better97.455.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Chick Halbert and Jim Pollard
MetricChick HalbertJim Pollard
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1358#533Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5+2.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable+2.2
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable+1.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+123 pts+837 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons02Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Chick Halbert and Jim Pollard
MetricChick HalbertJim Pollard
Games68319
Minutes1,73411,239

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Chick Halbert and Jim Pollard
MetricChick HalbertJim Pollard
True shooting percentage44.8%Better result for this metric.40.7%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Chick Halbert and Jim Pollard
MetricChick HalbertJim Pollard
Field-goal percentage36.5%Better result for this metric.35.8%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage69.4%76.0%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Chick Halbert and Jim Pollard
MetricChick HalbertJim Pollard
Assists per game2.33.2Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Chick Halbert and Jim Pollard
MetricChick HalbertJim Pollard
Rebounds per game7.9Better result for this metric.7.8

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Chick Halbert and Jim Pollard
MetricChick HalbertJim Pollard
Points per game7.412.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Pollard ranks higher in career impact.

Chick HalbertMetricJim Pollard
#885Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#163Leads
+1.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4Leads
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7
+123 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+837 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Jim Pollard leads every available measure below.

Chick HalbertMetricJim Pollard
34Listed-team regular-season wins218Leads
33.7%Listed-team winning percentage62.6%Leads
050-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
0Playoff team seasons5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Chick HalbertMetricJim Pollard
Not availablePlayoff appearances5
Not availablePlayoff games50
Not availableTeam playoff wins30
Not availableFinals appearances3
Not availableChampionships3

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Chick HalbertMetricJim Pollard
Not availableAll-Star4
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA2
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Chick HalbertJim PollardPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.