hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Chris Mills vs. Tom Meschery: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Tom Meschery ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1156Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#223Leads
+0.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7Leads
89.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better24.0Leads
+531 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,102 ptsLeads
168.7Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better44.8Leads
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1

Career Impact Rank places Tom Meschery #223 and Chris Mills #1156. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/chris-mills/tom-meschery/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedChris Mills110.387 · No. 1,156Tom Meschery29.420 · No. 223

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Chris Mills

110.387 composite · No. 1,156 all-time

Chris Mills's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 821996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate89.33350%44.667
Best 5No. 821996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1621994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate106.60030%31.980
Best 10No. 821996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1621994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1851993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1982001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2762000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 319168.70020%33.740

44.667 + 31.980 + 33.740= 110.387

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 319, this player's stored replacement finish.

Tom Meschery

29.420 composite · No. 223 all-time

Tom Meschery's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 151963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.00050%12.000
Best 5No. 151963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate28.20030%8.460
Best 10No. 151963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate44.80020%8.960

12.000 + 8.460 + 8.960= 29.420

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1156#223Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better89.324.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better106.628.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better168.744.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#750#416Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.1
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9+1.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5+0.7Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-0.2
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+531 pts+1,102 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Games568778
Minutes17,28223,459

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
True shooting percentage51.7%Better result for this metric.49.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.6%Better result for this metric.49.3%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Field-goal percentage43.2%44.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage35.1%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage81.7%Better result for this metric.74.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.4%Better result for this metric.7.5%
Assists per game1.9Better result for this metric.1.7
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.2%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.8%12.2%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.98.6Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.0%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Chris Mills and Tom Meschery
MetricChris MillsTom Meschery
Points per game11.212.7Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Tom Meschery ranks higher in career impact.

Chris MillsMetricTom Meschery
#1156Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#223Leads
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1
+0.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7Leads
+531 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,102 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Chris MillsMetricTom Meschery
338Listed-team regular-season wins697Leads
42.9%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.5%
050-win team seasons7Leads
060-win team seasons7Leads
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons3

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Chris MillsMetricTom Meschery
4LeadsPlayoff appearances3
19Playoff games39Leads
5Team playoff wins20Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Chris MillsMetricTom Meschery
Not availableAll-Star1
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Chris MillsTom MescheryPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.