hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Chris Mullin vs. Ron Harper: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Ron Harper ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#136Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#130Leads
+4.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2Leads
+3.7Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2Leads
12.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better14.0
+3,003 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,916 pts
31.3Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better25.4Leads

Career Impact Rank places Ron Harper #130 and Chris Mullin #136. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Chris Mullin had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/chris-mullin/ron-harper/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedChris Mullin18.187 · No. 136Ron Harper17.300 · No. 130

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Chris Mullin

18.187 composite · No. 136 all-time

Chris Mullin's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.33350%6.167
Best 5No. 101987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.20030%5.760
Best 10No. 101987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 421998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate31.30020%6.260

6.167 + 5.760 + 6.260= 18.187

Ron Harper

17.300 composite · No. 130 all-time

Ron Harper's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.00050%7.000
Best 5No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate17.40030%5.220
Best 10No. 101988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate25.40020%5.080

7.000 + 5.220 + 5.080= 17.300

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#136#130Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better12.3Better result for this metric.14.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.217.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better31.325.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#89Better result for this metric.#93
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.5+5.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2+4.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7+4.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0+3.4Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,003 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,916 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons11

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Games9861,009
Minutes32,16331,199

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
True shooting percentage59.4%Better result for this metric.51.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile60.7%Better result for this metric.51.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Field-goal percentage50.9%Better result for this metric.44.6%
Three-point percentage38.4%Better result for this metric.28.9%
Free-throw percentage86.5%Better result for this metric.72.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.8%19.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game3.53.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.4%13.2%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.1%7.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.14.3Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%2.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%1.6%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Chris Mullin and Ron Harper
MetricChris MullinRon Harper
Points per game18.2Better result for this metric.13.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Ron Harper ranks higher in career impact.

Chris MullinMetricRon Harper
#136Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#130Leads
+4.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2Leads
+3.7Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2Leads
+3,003 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,916 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Ron Harper leads every available measure below.

Chris MullinMetricRon Harper
611Listed-team regular-season wins732Leads
47.7%Listed-team winning percentage57.2%Leads
450-win team seasons6Leads
060-win team seasons4Leads
8Playoff team seasons11Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Ron Harper leads every available measure below.

Chris MullinMetricRon Harper
8Playoff appearances10Leads
71Playoff games112Leads
45Team playoff wins88Leads
1Finals appearances5Leads
0Championships5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Chris MullinMetricRon Harper
5All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
4All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Chris MullinRon HarperPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.