hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Clemon Johnson vs. Norm Nixon: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Clemon Johnson ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#830LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#993
+1.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1Leads
+0.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
59.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better76.7
+379 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+825 ptsLeads
140.4Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better131.9Leads

Career Impact Rank places Clemon Johnson #830 and Norm Nixon #993. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Norm Nixon had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/clemon-johnson/norm-nixon/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedClemon Johnson80.847 · No. 830Norm Nixon93.873 · No. 993

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Clemon Johnson

80.847 composite · No. 830 all-time

Clemon Johnson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 561979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate59.33350%29.667
Best 5No. 561979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate77.00030%23.100
Best 10No. 561979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1881984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1901985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2131983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2281987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate140.40020%28.080

29.667 + 23.100 + 28.080= 80.847

Norm Nixon

93.873 composite · No. 993 all-time

Norm Nixon's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 271978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1111985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate76.66750%38.333
Best 5No. 271978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1111985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1191980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1371977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate97.20030%29.160
Best 10No. 271978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1111985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1191980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1371977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1371984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1901982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2191988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate131.90020%26.380

38.333 + 29.160 + 26.380= 93.873

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#830Better result for this metric.#993
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better59.3Better result for this metric.76.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better77.0Better result for this metric.97.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better140.4131.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#912#540Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4+2.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0Better result for this metric.+0.7
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6Better result for this metric.+0.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1-0.8Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+379 pts+825 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Games761768
Minutes13,31027,250

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
True shooting percentage51.9%Better result for this metric.51.7%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.6%Better result for this metric.51.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Field-goal percentage49.2%Better result for this metric.48.3%
Three-point percentage0.0%29.4%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage62.1%77.2%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.0%31.7%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.08.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.3%Better result for this metric.17.3%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.3%Better result for this metric.4.0%
Rebounds per game4.6Better result for this metric.2.6

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.2%2.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.0%Better result for this metric.0.1%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Clemon Johnson and Norm Nixon
MetricClemon JohnsonNorm Nixon
Points per game5.415.7Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Clemon Johnson ranks higher in career impact.

Clemon JohnsonMetricNorm Nixon
#830LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#993
+1.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1Leads
+0.6LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
+379 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+825 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Clemon Johnson leads every available measure below.

Clemon JohnsonMetricNorm Nixon
493LeadsListed-team regular-season wins435
54.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage53.0%
450-win team seasons4
160-win team seasons1
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons6

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Clemon JohnsonMetricNorm Nixon
8LeadsPlayoff appearances6
66LeadsPlayoff games58
38LeadsTeam playoff wins37
1Finals appearances3Leads
1Championships2Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Clemon JohnsonMetricNorm Nixon
Not availableAll-Star2
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Clemon JohnsonNorm NixonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.