hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Clyde Lee vs. Greg Ostertag: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Clyde Lee ranks higher in career impact

Clyde Lee

1966–67 to 1975–76 · 10 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#842LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1500
-0.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Leads
-1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Leads
71.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better139.7
+233 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+244 ptsLeads
110.4LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better183.2

Career Impact Rank places Clyde Lee #842 and Greg Ostertag #1500. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Greg Ostertag had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/clyde-lee/greg-ostertag/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedClyde Lee81.340 · No. 842Greg Ostertag152.073 · No. 1,500

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Clyde Lee

81.340 composite · No. 842 all-time

Clyde Lee's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 681967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate71.00050%35.500
Best 5No. 681967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 971969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate79.20030%23.760
Best 10No. 681967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 971969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1541975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate110.40020%22.080

35.500 + 23.760 + 22.080= 81.340

Greg Ostertag

152.073 composite · No. 1,500 all-time

Greg Ostertag's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1281998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1292003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate139.66750%69.833
Best 5No. 1281998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1292003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1731996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate152.00030%45.600
Best 10No. 1281998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1292003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1731996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1852001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2042000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2272004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2331997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate183.20020%36.640

69.833 + 45.600 + 36.640= 152.073

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#842Better result for this metric.#1500
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better71.0Better result for this metric.139.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better79.2Better result for this metric.152.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better110.4Better result for this metric.183.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1124#1106Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4-0.0Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8-0.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1-0.5Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.6-1.1Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+233 pts+244 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Games742756
Minutes19,88514,753

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
True shooting percentage47.0%51.6%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile47.2%50.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Field-goal percentage43.2%48.6%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable10.0%
Free-throw percentage61.4%Better result for this metric.56.9%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.2%5.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.1Better result for this metric.0.6
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable17.7%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.3%Better result for this metric.17.2%
Rebounds per game10.3Better result for this metric.5.5

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%0.7%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.6%6.9%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Clyde Lee and Greg Ostertag
MetricClyde LeeGreg Ostertag
Points per game7.7Better result for this metric.4.6

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Clyde Lee ranks higher in career impact.

Clyde LeeMetricGreg Ostertag
#842LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1500
-0.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Leads
-1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Leads
+233 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+244 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Clyde LeeMetricGreg Ostertag
901LeadsListed-team regular-season wins550
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage63.2%Leads
11Leads50-win team seasons6
11Leads60-win team seasons2
7Playoff team seasons9Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Greg Ostertag leads every available measure below.

Clyde LeeMetricGreg Ostertag
7Playoff appearances9Leads
51Playoff games89Leads
23Team playoff wins50Leads
1Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Clyde LeeMetricGreg Ostertag
1All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Clyde LeeGreg OstertagPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.