Curtis Rowe
1971–72 to 1978–79 · 8 seasons
NBA player comparison
Curtis Rowe vs. Walter Dukes: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Walter Dukes ranks higher in career impact
Walter Dukes
1955–56 to 1962–63 · 8 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#1125Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#413Leads
-0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6
-0.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
91.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better44.3Leads
+245 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+180 pts
148.3Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better60.8Leads
Career Impact Rank places Walter Dukes #413 and Curtis Rowe #1125. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Curtis Rowe had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCurtis Rowe106.480 · No. 1,125Walter Dukes48.787 · No. 413
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Curtis Rowe
106.480 composite · No. 1,125 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 811972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 91.000 | 50% | 45.500 |
| Best 5No. 811972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1261976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 104.400 | 30% | 31.320 |
| Best 10No. 811972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1261976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1341971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2231978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2251977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 189.5 | 148.300 | 20% | 29.660 |
45.500 + 31.320 + 29.660= 106.480
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 189.5, this player's stored replacement finish.
Walter Dukes
48.787 composite · No. 413 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 351960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 44.333 | 50% | 22.167 |
| Best 5No. 351960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 48.200 | 30% | 14.460 |
| Best 10No. 351960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 81 | 60.800 | 20% | 12.160 |
22.167 + 14.460 + 12.160= 48.787
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 81, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #1125 | #413Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 91.0 | 44.3Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 104.4 | 48.2Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 148.3 | 60.8Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #1104Better result for this metric. | #1229 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.5Better result for this metric. | -0.6 |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.6Better result for this metric. | -1.0 |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.8Better result for this metric. | -1.2 |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +245 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +180 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 590 | 553 |
| Minutes | 18,277 | 14,671 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 51.9%Better result for this metric. | 45.1% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 51.4%Better result for this metric. | 45.8% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 48.2%Better result for this metric. | 36.9% |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 70.1%Better result for this metric. | 70.0% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 7.0% | Unavailable |
| Assists per game | 1.6Better result for this metric. | 1.1 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 19.2% | Unavailable |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 11.7% | Unavailable |
| Rebounds per game | 7.2 | 11.3Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.7% | Unavailable |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.8% | Unavailable |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Curtis Rowe | Walter Dukes |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 11.6Better result for this metric. | 10.4 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Walter Dukes ranks higher in career impact.
Curtis RoweMetricWalter Dukes
#1125Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#413Leads
-0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6
-0.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
+245 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+180 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Curtis RoweMetricWalter Dukes
515LeadsListed-team regular-season wins265
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage44.0%Leads
5Leads50-win team seasons0
5Leads60-win team seasons0
4Playoff team seasons8Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Walter Dukes leads every available measure below.
Curtis RoweMetricWalter Dukes
4Playoff appearances7Leads
28Playoff games35Leads
13Team playoff wins14Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
Walter Dukes leads every available measure below.
Curtis RoweMetricWalter Dukes
1All-Star2Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Curtis RoweWalter DukesPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Curtis RoweNBA seasonWalter Dukes
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.