hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · DET / MNL / NYK

Walter Dukes

Walter Dukes stats, teams and career impact

#413 all-timeCareer averages · 10.4 PPG · 11.3 RPG · 1.1 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Center
Final NBA team
Detroit Pistons
Height / weight
7 ft 0 in (213 cm) · 220 lb (100 kg)
Born
June 23, 1930
Died
March 13, 2001 (70 yrs old)
College
Seton Hall
NBA seasons
8 seasons · 1955–56 to 1962–63

Career summaryWalter Dukes was a center who played 8 NBA seasons, from 1955–56 through 1962–63.

Career PPG
10.4
Career RPG
11.3
Career APG
1.1
Best-Season Impact Rank
#35 in 1960–61
Career Impact Rank
#413 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Walter Dukes ranks #413 all time

Walter Dukes ranks #413 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #44.3. His full-career value ranks #1229, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity.

Peak#35 in 1960–61

Best league finish

Sustained excellence8 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth8 seasons

553 games · Career Value Rank #1229

NBA honors2× All-StarContext only; honors are not model inputs.

Head to head

Compare Walter Dukes with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Walter Dukes vs. John Gianelli Similar career path
  2. Walter Dukes vs. J.J. Hickson Similar career path
  3. Walter Dukes vs. Jim Krebs Similar career path
  4. Walter Dukes vs. Ray Felix Similar career path
  5. Walter Dukes vs. Curtis Rowe Similar career path
  6. Walter Dukes vs. Kevin Kunnert Similar career path
  7. Walter Dukes vs. Dave Piontek Same-era comparison
  8. Walter Dukes vs. Jim Loscutoff Same-era comparison
  9. Walter Dukes vs. Slick Leonard Same-era comparison
  10. Walter Dukes vs. Johnny McCarthy Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
New York Knicks, Minneapolis Lakers, and Detroit Pistons

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
36.9%FG%
Three-point
—3P%
Free throw
70.0%FT%

553 career games · 14,671 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Walter Dukes stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
1962–634.35.80.9-3.10DET62014.732.5%—73.7%#78-25.1
1961–629.410.41.6-1.10DET77024.639.6%—71.5%#4644.3
1960–6111.714.11.9-0.59DET73028.040.5%—70.3%#3575.6
1959–6015.213.41.2-1.66DET66032.436.1%—74.0%#5418.5
1958–5913.013.30.9-1.62DET72032.535.2%—65.7%#5822.1
1957–5811.213.30.7-1.60DET72030.334.9%—67.5%#5421.6
1956–5710.111.20.8-1.20MNL71026.336.4%—68.9%#5235.8
1955–567.87.40.7-2.44NYK60021.540.3%—70.8%#69-12.7
Career10.411.31.1—DET/MNL/NYK553—26.536.9%—70.0%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#430

48.2 average league finish

Career Value Rank#1229

180 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Walter Dukes ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score48.8

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
81.0
Qualified seasons
8
All-time rank
#413
Strongest seasons

Every season

Walter Dukes advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
1962–63Historical Defense EstimateDET3262913-3.1015.4#78-25.116thModeled
1961–62Historical Defense EstimateDET31771,896-1.1047.7#4644.351stModeled
1960–61Historical Defense EstimateDET30732,044-0.5957.0#3575.661stModeled
1959–60Historical Defense EstimateDET29662,140-1.6632.1#5418.540thModeled
1958–59Historical Defense EstimateDET28722,338-1.6228.8#5822.138thModeled
1957–58Historical Defense EstimateDET27722,184-1.6030.3#5421.634thModeled
1956–57Historical Defense EstimateMNL26711,866-1.2035.4#5235.842ndModeled
1955–56Historical Defense EstimateNYK25601,290-2.449.3#69-12.79thModeled

Career movement

Walter Dukes's box impact by season

Peak box impact -0.59 points per 100 possessions in 1960–61 · 8 seasons · 14,671 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutesModeled estimate
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Walter DukesJohn Gianelli
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Walter Dukes and John Gianelli era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonWalter DukesJohn Gianelli
1-2.4-2.4
2-1.2-1.0
3-1.6-0.9
4-1.6-1.4
5-1.7-1.6
6-0.6-0.5
7-1.1-1.3
8-3.1-7.0

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Walter Dukes

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →