hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Dakari Johnson vs. Lamar Green: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

—Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1265
—Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3
—Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.3
—Best league finish#97
-9 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-36 pts
31Games360Leads

Career Impact Rank is unavailable for at least one player in this scope. hussEyquation does not substitute a different measure or declare a winner.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/dakari-johnson/lamar-green/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDakari JohnsonUnavailableLamar Green123.613 · No. 1,265

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Dakari Johnson

Career Composite unavailable

An official score cannot be shown because the stored rank or required source inputs are unavailable.

Lamar Green

123.613 composite · No. 1,265 all-time

Lamar Green's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 971971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1161970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1221972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate111.66750%55.833
Best 5No. 971971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1161970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1221972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1651973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate127.20030%38.160
Best 10No. 971971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1161970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1221972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1651973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 169148.10020%29.620

55.833 + 38.160 + 29.620= 123.613

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 169, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rankUnavailable#1265
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is betterUnavailable111.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is betterUnavailable127.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is betterUnavailable148.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#2713Better result for this metric.#3888
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-1.3
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-1.5
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-2.3
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-9 ptsBetter result for this metric.-36 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Games31360
Minutes1616,448

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
True shooting percentage57.5%Better result for this metric.46.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable46.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Field-goal percentage56.4%Better result for this metric.43.0%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage55.0%65.0%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable4.9%
Assists per game0.30.7Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable16.7%
Rebounds per game1.16.4Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.3%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Dakari Johnson and Lamar Green
MetricDakari JohnsonLamar Green
Points per game1.85.2Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader.

Dakari JohnsonMetricLamar Green
Not availableCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1265
Not availablePeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.3
-9 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-36 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Dakari JohnsonMetricLamar Green
48Listed-team regular-season wins492Leads
58.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
050-win team seasons6Leads
060-win team seasons6Leads
1Playoff team seasons1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Lamar Green leads every available measure below.

Dakari JohnsonMetricLamar Green
1Playoff appearances1
2Playoff games6Leads
2Team playoff wins3Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dakari JohnsonMetricLamar Green
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Dakari JohnsonLamar GreenPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.