hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Damian Lillard vs. Oscar Robertson: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Oscar Robertson ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#77Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#17Leads
+7.9LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.6
+6.4LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.1
8.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better2.0Leads
+4,028 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+6,676 ptsLeads
3Top-10 impact seasons10Leads

Career Impact Rank places Oscar Robertson #17 and Damian Lillard #77. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Damian Lillard had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/damian-lillard/oscar-robertson/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDamian Lillard11.387 · No. 77Oscar Robertson2.440 · No. 17

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Damian Lillard

11.387 composite · No. 77 all-time

Damian Lillard's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 62022–23No. 92017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.33350%4.167
Best 5No. 62022–23No. 92017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 112020–21No. 192018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.00030%3.300
Best 10No. 62022–23No. 92017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 112020–21No. 192018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 362024–25No. 402021–2219.60020%3.920

4.167 + 3.300 + 3.920= 11.387

Oscar Robertson

2.440 composite · No. 17 all-time

Oscar Robertson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 21960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2.00050%1.000
Best 5No. 21960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2.40030%0.720
Best 10No. 21960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3.60020%0.720

1.000 + 0.720 + 0.720= 2.440

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#77#17Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.32.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better11.02.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.63.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#45#10Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.9Better result for this metric.+6.6
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.9Better result for this metric.+6.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.4Better result for this metric.+6.1
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0+5.1Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+4,028 pts+6,676 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons08Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons310Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Games9001,040
Minutes32,61443,886

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
True shooting percentage59.0%Better result for this metric.56.4%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile59.5%Better result for this metric.57.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Field-goal percentage43.9%48.5%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage37.1%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage89.9%Better result for this metric.83.8%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile32.0%33.2%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game6.79.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.5%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.7%Unavailable
Rebounds per game4.37.5Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Damian Lillard and Oscar Robertson
MetricDamian LillardOscar Robertson
Points per game25.125.7Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Oscar Robertson ranks higher in career impact.

Damian LillardMetricOscar Robertson
#77Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#17Leads
+7.9LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.6
+6.4LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.1
+4,028 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+6,676 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Damian LillardMetricOscar Robertson
559Listed-team regular-season wins988Leads
53.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.5%
350-win team seasons11Leads
060-win team seasons10Leads
10Playoff team seasons10

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Oscar Robertson leads every available measure below.

Damian LillardMetricOscar Robertson
10Playoff appearances10
68Playoff games86Leads
25Team playoff wins46Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Oscar Robertson leads every available measure below.

Damian LillardMetricOscar Robertson
9All-Star12Leads
0MVP1Leads
7All-NBA11Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1Rookie of the Year1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Damian LillardOscar RobertsonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.