hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Damian Lillard vs. Terrell Brandon: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Damian Lillard ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#77LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#94
+7.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+8.1Leads
+6.4LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.4
+4,028 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,298 pts
3LeadsTop-10 impact seasons2
19.6LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better27.9

Career Impact Rank places Damian Lillard #77 and Terrell Brandon #94. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Terrell Brandon had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/damian-lillard/terrell-brandon/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDamian Lillard11.387 · No. 77Terrell Brandon13.467 · No. 94

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Damian Lillard

11.387 composite · No. 77 all-time

Damian Lillard's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 62022–23No. 92017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.33350%4.167
Best 5No. 62022–23No. 92017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 112020–21No. 192018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.00030%3.300
Best 10No. 62022–23No. 92017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 112020–21No. 192018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 362024–25No. 402021–2219.60020%3.920

4.167 + 3.300 + 3.920= 11.387

Terrell Brandon

13.467 composite · No. 94 all-time

Terrell Brandon's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 31995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.33350%4.167
Best 5No. 31995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 182001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.40030%3.720
Best 10No. 31995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 182001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 971993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.90020%5.580

4.167 + 3.720 + 5.580= 13.467

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#77Better result for this metric.#94
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.38.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better11.0Better result for this metric.12.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.6Better result for this metric.27.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#45Better result for this metric.#144
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.9+8.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.9Better result for this metric.+6.2
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.4Better result for this metric.+5.4
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0Better result for this metric.+4.0
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+4,028 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,298 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons01Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons3Better result for this metric.2

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Games900724
Minutes32,61421,545

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
True shooting percentage59.0%Better result for this metric.51.9%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile59.5%Better result for this metric.51.7%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Field-goal percentage43.9%44.8%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage37.1%Better result for this metric.35.5%
Free-throw percentage89.9%Better result for this metric.87.3%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile32.0%36.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game6.7Better result for this metric.6.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.5%Better result for this metric.12.7%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.7%Better result for this metric.6.1%
Rebounds per game4.3Better result for this metric.3.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%2.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%0.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Damian Lillard and Terrell Brandon
MetricDamian LillardTerrell Brandon
Points per game25.1Better result for this metric.13.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Damian Lillard ranks higher in career impact.

Damian LillardMetricTerrell Brandon
#77LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#94
+7.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+8.1Leads
+6.4LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.4
+4,028 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,298 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Damian LillardMetricTerrell Brandon
559LeadsListed-team regular-season wins526
53.3%Listed-team winning percentage57.2%Leads
350-win team seasons4Leads
060-win team seasons0
10Playoff team seasons10

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Damian Lillard leads every available measure below.

Damian LillardMetricTerrell Brandon
10LeadsPlayoff appearances7
68LeadsPlayoff games38
25LeadsTeam playoff wins15
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Damian Lillard leads every available measure below.

Damian LillardMetricTerrell Brandon
9LeadsAll-Star2
0MVP0
7LeadsAll-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Damian LillardTerrell BrandonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.