hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Danny Ferry vs. Harvey Grant: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Harvey Grant ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1097Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1055Leads
+2.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8
+0.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3
81.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better78.7Leads
+307 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+646 ptsLeads
155.2Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better147.1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Harvey Grant #1055 and Danny Ferry #1097. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Danny Ferry had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/danny-ferry/harvey-grant/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDanny Ferry103.940 · No. 1,097Harvey Grant100.193 · No. 1,055

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Danny Ferry

103.940 composite · No. 1,097 all-time

Danny Ferry's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 291994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1021992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1121995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate81.00050%40.500
Best 5No. 291994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1021992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1121995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1512001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate108.00030%32.400
Best 10No. 291994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1021992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1121995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1512001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1832000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1901998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1931993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2031999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2431990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate155.20020%31.040

40.500 + 32.400 + 31.040= 103.940

Harvey Grant

100.193 composite · No. 1,055 all-time

Harvey Grant's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 511990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate78.66750%39.333
Best 5No. 511990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1321994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1561989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate104.80030%31.440
Best 10No. 511990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1321994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1561989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1581988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1651993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1811996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1951995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2481998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate147.10020%29.420

39.333 + 31.440 + 29.420= 100.193

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1097#1055Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better81.078.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better108.0104.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better155.2147.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#999#663Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Better result for this metric.+1.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1Better result for this metric.+1.0
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Better result for this metric.+0.3
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7-0.7
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+307 pts+646 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Games917783
Minutes18,13320,510

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
True shooting percentage53.6%Better result for this metric.50.0%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile55.1%Better result for this metric.48.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Field-goal percentage44.6%46.9%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage39.3%Better result for this metric.26.7%
Free-throw percentage84.0%Better result for this metric.70.9%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.0%Better result for this metric.8.5%
Assists per game1.31.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.5%8.5%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.2%9.1%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.84.4Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%1.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.2%1.4%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Danny Ferry and Harvey Grant
MetricDanny FerryHarvey Grant
Points per game7.09.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Harvey Grant ranks higher in career impact.

Danny FerryMetricHarvey Grant
#1097Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1055Leads
+2.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8
+0.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3
+307 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+646 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Danny Ferry leads every available measure below.

Danny FerryMetricHarvey Grant
600LeadsListed-team regular-season wins397
58.0%LeadsListed-team winning percentage45.6%
5Leads50-win team seasons0
1Leads60-win team seasons0
9LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Danny Ferry leads every available measure below.

Danny FerryMetricHarvey Grant
9LeadsPlayoff appearances5
67LeadsPlayoff games19
41LeadsTeam playoff wins6
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Danny FerryMetricHarvey Grant
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Danny FerryHarvey GrantPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.