hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Danny Green vs. George Hill: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

George Hill ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#346Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#293Leads
+4.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.7Leads
+2.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3Leads
30.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better24.0Leads
+1,481 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,446 pts
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads

Career Impact Rank places George Hill #293 and Danny Green #346. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Danny Green had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/danny-green/george-hill/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDanny Green42.340 · No. 346George Hill36.960 · No. 293

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Danny Green

42.340 composite · No. 346 all-time

Danny Green's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 142014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate30.00050%15.000
Best 5No. 142014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 702018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate41.80030%12.540
Best 10No. 142014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 702018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 812017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 932016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1002020–21No. 1072015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1502019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate74.00020%14.800

15.000 + 12.540 + 14.800= 42.340

George Hill

36.960 composite · No. 293 all-time

George Hill's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 92014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.00050%12.000
Best 5No. 92014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 452019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 592011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate35.20030%10.560
Best 10No. 92014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 452019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 592011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 662013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 952009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1052015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1282010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1502017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate72.00020%14.400

12.000 + 10.560 + 14.400= 36.960

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#346#293Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better30.024.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better41.835.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better74.072.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#290Better result for this metric.#302
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.5+5.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3+3.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8+3.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8+1.9Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,481 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,446 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Games832915
Minutes20,89924,501

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
True shooting percentage56.8%57.3%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile56.6%58.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Field-goal percentage42.1%45.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage40.0%Better result for this metric.38.0%
Free-throw percentage80.5%80.6%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.8%19.2%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.53.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.5%11.3%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.7%Better result for this metric.6.3%
Rebounds per game3.4Better result for this metric.3.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.0%Better result for this metric.1.7%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.5%Better result for this metric.0.8%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Danny Green and George Hill
MetricDanny GreenGeorge Hill
Points per game8.710.4Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

George Hill ranks higher in career impact.

Danny GreenMetricGeorge Hill
#346Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#293Leads
+4.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.7Leads
+2.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.3Leads
+1,481 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,446 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Danny Green leads every available measure below.

Danny GreenMetricGeorge Hill
881LeadsListed-team regular-season wins873
69.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage57.7%
13Leads50-win team seasons10
5Leads60-win team seasons2
16LeadsPlayoff team seasons14

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Danny Green leads every available measure below.

Danny GreenMetricGeorge Hill
13Playoff appearances13
169LeadsPlayoff games144
107LeadsTeam playoff wins82
4LeadsFinals appearances1
3LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Danny GreenMetricGeorge Hill
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
1All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Danny GreenGeorge HillPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.