hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Dave Gambee vs. Tom Hawkins: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Dave Gambee ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#331LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#354
+0.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8
34.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better36.7
+408 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+335 pts
56.6LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better58.7

Career Impact Rank places Dave Gambee #331 and Tom Hawkins #354. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/dave-gambee/tom-hawkins/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDave Gambee41.013 · No. 331Tom Hawkins42.973 · No. 354

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Dave Gambee

41.013 composite · No. 331 all-time

Dave Gambee's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 251961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate34.66750%17.333
Best 5No. 251961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate41.20030%12.360
Best 10No. 251961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate56.60020%11.320

17.333 + 12.360 + 11.320= 41.013

Tom Hawkins

42.973 composite · No. 354 all-time

Tom Hawkins's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 331962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.66750%18.333
Best 5No. 331962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate43.00030%12.900
Best 10No. 331962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 941968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate58.70020%11.740

18.333 + 12.900 + 11.740= 42.973

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Dave Gambee and Tom Hawkins
MetricDave GambeeTom Hawkins
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#331Better result for this metric.#354
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better34.7Better result for this metric.36.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better41.2Better result for this metric.43.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better56.6Better result for this metric.58.7
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Dave Gambee and Tom Hawkins
MetricDave GambeeTom Hawkins
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#878Better result for this metric.#966
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4Better result for this metric.-0.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Better result for this metric.-0.6
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Better result for this metric.-0.8
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1Better result for this metric.-1.3
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+408 ptsBetter result for this metric.+335 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Dave Gambee and Tom Hawkins
MetricDave GambeeTom Hawkins
Games750764
Minutes14,66518,465

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Dave Gambee and Tom Hawkins
MetricDave GambeeTom Hawkins
True shooting percentage50.0%Better result for this metric.47.3%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile49.6%Better result for this metric.47.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Dave Gambee and Tom Hawkins
MetricDave GambeeTom Hawkins
Field-goal percentage42.0%44.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage82.2%Better result for this metric.57.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Dave Gambee and Tom Hawkins
MetricDave GambeeTom Hawkins
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.0%Better result for this metric.6.0%
Assists per game1.01.1Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Dave Gambee and Tom Hawkins
MetricDave GambeeTom Hawkins
Rebounds per game5.26.0Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Dave Gambee and Tom Hawkins
MetricDave GambeeTom Hawkins
Points per game10.6Better result for this metric.8.7

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Dave Gambee ranks higher in career impact.

Dave GambeeMetricTom Hawkins
#331LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#354
+0.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8
+408 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+335 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Dave GambeeMetricTom Hawkins
844LeadsListed-team regular-season wins617
0.6%Listed-team winning percentage0.6%
750-win team seasons7
7Leads60-win team seasons5
9Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Dave GambeeMetricTom Hawkins
7Playoff appearances10Leads
43Playoff games96Leads
28Team playoff wins52Leads
1Finals appearances3Leads
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dave GambeeMetricTom Hawkins
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Dave GambeeTom HawkinsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.