Dave Twardzik
1978–79
64 games · 1,570 minutes
NBA player comparison
Dave Twardzik vs. Earl Tatum: 1978–79 season
Regular-season verdict
Dave Twardzik leads in impact for 1978–79
Dave Twardzik ranks ahead of Earl Tatum in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.
Earl Tatum
1978–79
79 games · 1,233 minutes
Impact comparison
Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.
+0.2LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.8
#81LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#168
64Games79
1,570Minutes1,233
10.4LeadsPPG7.7
65.1%LeadsTS%46.5%
Dave Twardzik's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +0.2, compared with -1.8 for Earl Tatum. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 1978–79 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.
Dave Twardzik: 64 games and 1,570 minutes. Earl Tatum: 79 games and 1,233 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.
Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Behind the estimate
Why the model rates them this way
A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.
What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.
Full comparison · 1978–79 season
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.
| Metric | Dave Twardzik | Earl Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.2Better result for this metric. | -1.8 |
| Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best | #81Better result for this metric. | #168 |
Dave Twardzik: verified lineup window unavailable. Earl Tatum: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Dave Twardzik | Earl Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 64 | 79 |
| Minutes | 1,570 | 1,233 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Dave Twardzik | Earl Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 65.1%Better result for this metric. | 46.5% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Dave Twardzik | Earl Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 53.3%Better result for this metric. | 44.7% |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 87.3%Better result for this metric. | 73.2% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Dave Twardzik | Earl Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Assists per game | 2.8Better result for this metric. | 0.9 |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Dave Twardzik | Earl Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 1.9Better result for this metric. | 1.6 |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Dave Twardzik | Earl Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 10.4Better result for this metric. | 7.7 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Dave Twardzik leads in impact for 1978–79.
Dave TwardzikMetricEarl Tatum
+0.2LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.8
#81LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#168
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Dave TwardzikMetricEarl Tatum
190Listed-team regular-season wins225Leads
57.9%LeadsListed-team winning percentage45.7%
150-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons0
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons2
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Dave Twardzik leads every available measure below.
Dave TwardzikMetricEarl Tatum
4LeadsPlayoff appearances1
25LeadsPlayoff games11
18LeadsTeam playoff wins4
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Dave TwardzikMetricEarl Tatum
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Selected seasons
Box impact
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.
Dave TwardzikEarl Tatum
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average